There is no compelling science behind at-home or in-office heat therapy devices for acne. These devices are money-makers for the companies that sell the devices and replacement "tips," but buyer beware.
At-home Devices for Spot Treatment
In recent years, heat therapy devices like Zeno™, No! No! Skin™, and ThermaClear™ have hit the market, claiming to help heal acne lesions quickly by killing acne bacteria. The devices are marketed for mild, inflammatory acne (little red zits) only, and are designed to treat pimples that are already present. They do nothing for prevention, and tend to leave users chasing pimples around their face at up to 50 cents per "zap." Even so, if these devices worked, they would be great tools to have. Unfortunately, we're looking at a big "If." Science on these devices is incomplete at best, and based on our own admittedly unscientific trial here at Acne.org, they simply do not work.
In-office Devices for Spot Treatment
Cosmetic dermatologists sometimes offer radiofrequency treatments that use heat in an attempt to plump the skin and provide anti-aging benefits in their offices. There is one very small, flawed and incomplete study showing some promise of these devices in treating acne as well. These treatments can be costly, and the jury is still out on whether these heat-producing radiofrequency devices can do anything for acne.
The medical concept behind all heat-producing acne treatment devices is that heat causes acne bacteria to activate heat-shock proteins, which then damages or kills some of the bacteria. Researchers theorize that acne bacteria plays a role in the process by which a clogged pore becomes inflamed, so damaging or eliminating some bacteria could theoretically help prevent a clogged pore from becoming a full-blown pimple. If this all sounds vague, that's because it is. The science behind these devices is scant at best.
At-home: Much of the science behind at-home devices comes from a single unpublished study which employs subjective analysis, and presents only two subject pictures.1Adding further questions to whether heat devices can do anything for acne, a more recent study showed that bacteria that were killed by heat were still able to produce an inflammatory response.2
In-office: Regarding radiofrequency devices at cosmetic dermatologists' offices, one small study published in Dermatologic Surgery investigated the effectiveness of the ThermaCool™ device in 22 patients. The device works by generating electromagnetic energy, which heats a small area of the skin, while simultaneously spraying a cooling substance on the skin that prevents the heat from damaging the skin. “An excellent response (75% or better diminution in active acne lesion counts) was seen in 92% of the patients, a modest response (25% to 50% better on active acne lesion counts) in 9%, and no response (less than 25% in acne lesion counts) in 9%. Student’s test showed a highly statistically significant difference in before versus after lesion counts. Acne was not made worse in any of these patients.”3Although this study suggests that radiofrequency therapy may be effective as a treatment for acne, it should be kept in mind that this study included a very small number of people and was funded by Thermage, Inc., the company that makes the device. In addition, the authors of the study did not describe how the response rate was measured and whether the person assessing the acne counts was blinded to the treatment. We therefore cannot draw any conclusions from this study.
Much more research is required before we even begin to know whether at-home or in-office heat therapy devices have the potential to fulfill their promises.
The Bottom Line
At-home: There is no science to support the use of at-home heat devices for treating acne. Since the beginning of civilization, salesmen have produced "miracle devices" which claim to heal just about every disease known to man. When something seems too good to be true, it usually is. When you consider the paucity of science behind these products, and also consider the cost of the devices combined with the cost of "replacement tips," a healthy dose of skepticism is in order.
In-office: Radiofrequency devices also do not have any rigorous or replicated data to back up their efficacy.
The Experts at Acne.org
Our team of medical doctors, biology & chemistry PhDs, and acne experts work hand-in-hand with Dan (Acne.org founder) to provide the most complete information on all things acne. If you find any errors in this article, kindly use this Feedback Form and let us know.
- Bruce, S. et al. Significant Efficacy and Safety of Low Level Intermittent Heat in Patients with Mild to Moderate Acne. Suzanne Bruce and Associates, Tyrell Inc., Synergos Inc.
- Lyte, P., Sur, R., Nigam, A. & Southall, M. D. Heat killed Propionibacterium acnes is capable of inducing inflammatory responses in skin. Exp. Dermatol. 18, 1070–1072 (2009).
- Ruiz-Esparza, J. & Gomez, J. B. Nonablative radiofrequency for active acne vulgaris: the use of deep dermal heat in the treatment of moderate to severe active acne vulgaris (thermotherapy): a report of 22 patients. Dermatol. Surg. 29, 333–339; discussion 339 (2003).