Acne.org Products
2 hours ago, JaysonC said:Just don't set your hopes too high. Scars are for life. Can be improved a little bit but still will be very visible and bothersome. Look how many people have had 10+ 20+ procedures and still have their scars. Even if you have 50% improvement, the scars are still there. No laser, no peel, no filler can make them disappear.
Dr Mark Taylor has stated average improvement from Taylor Liberator subcision is 70%. Of course, he might be biased though but my experience with Dr Hazany confirms that stat since I got even more than 70% improvement.
2 hours ago, Amanda Hall said:Scars are for life and I agree. 50% improvement could be enough for some people - me, for example. Even though my scars will never go away, just improving them above a certain threshold will make me more confident. When a scar is really deep, it's bothersome. But when it's just a shallow divot and has a shape that isn't that bad, it's much more acceptable. Sure, people will see it, but their eyes aren't locked on it because the scar kinda blends in with your face. That's why I'm satisfied with some of the treatments I've done. Before, it was a single big scar that dominated my face. Then laser treatments smoothed it out and now it's hard to set your eyes on it.
People need to know that scars will never go away from the start. But you need to know that many sufferers here are happy to get to a certain point where they are comfortable not wearing makeup or just going out and about without thinking about their scars.
Just did a Cross treatment several weeks ago and it got rid of a harsh border of a narrow boxcar scar. I really hope it's not swelling and that the scar will look more sunken after a month or two. I'd say the improvement was 25-40% if this sticks. That's almost good enough for me to call this a victory.
Sure if you got like 1 big scar or two three tiny dots here and there you can celebrate a victory.
1 hour ago, downinthedms said:Dr Mark Taylor has stated average improvement from Taylor Liberator subcision is 70%. Of course, he might be biased though but my experience with Dr Hazany confirms that stat since I got even more than 70% improvement.
What Dr Mark Taylor states and what he shows as results in before/ afters (nothing) are two pair of shoes.
Sure 70% are achievable. With a temp filler. And then the filler dissolves and 70 become20.
Even with filler extra for volume you don't get 100%.
Even if you go to all the best doctors and have like 10+ of their best treatments the scars are still pretty visible.
On 8/1/2021 at 5:10 PM, Danny562 said:After receiving what I believed to be a botched TCA cross by another dermatologist, I decided to switch and foundHazany also. He is expensive when you compare him toother dermatologist in LA but I don't feel like he is ripping me off because I am seeing results. If people can't afford his services, they should go somewhere else. You can't blame him for being able to charge"whatever the market will bear." It's called running a profitable business. I don't know him personally nor am I a fanboy just some dude on the internet whois tired of having acne and scars. Check out my post to see my progress. I am due for a subcision on the 3rd of August and will be receiving future treatment from him.
Check out my latest photo for before and after. He has proven to me he can deliver results and will be getting all my treatment from him.
What treatment did you have with Hazany that resulted in progress? The one phenol cross on your large boxcars?Subcision? How much did you pay if you don't mind me asking? Can you pm me with the information?
What does Dr Hazany's Trifecta treatment consist of exactly?
10 hours ago, downinthedms said:Dr Mark Taylor has stated average improvement from Taylor Liberator subcision is 70%. Of course, he might be biased though but my experience with Dr Hazany confirms that stat since I got even more than 70% improvement.
I didn't read thisthread in its entirety so sorry if my remark duplicates anyone else's comment. First, swelling can last a long time and assessment should be made after 3-months post op. Second, you injected Sculptra. That alone should raise a red flag. Dermal filler, while important, is not a true solution. Finally, to say that you got more than 70% improvement with just one treatment is an insult to everyone's intelligence here. We're no strangers to acne scars. If there are folks more educated about acne scars, it would be this community and we know it's not possible to get 70% improvement after one procedure, whether that be a single or a cocktail treatment.
8 hours ago, Danny562 said:
I am fully aware my scars will never completely disappear and I am ok with that. Improvement is what I am after. I will stop receiving treatments when I am no longer getting a ROI (return on investment).
Your choice mate. Taking into consideration the extraorbitant prices for scar treatments which are known toseldom produce satisfactory results (40-50% at best , if you're in luck ) it is not a good investment to begin withif you ask me. It has not been proven that Taylor liberator produces better results than cannula; if anything it poses more risk of hematoma or nerve damage. But each to their own.
I am just trying to caution you as I read the thread's title 95% improvement just to keep any expectations realistic.
Anyway, good luck with your treatment, I hope you see results.
On 7/28/2021 at 12:24 AM, Amanda Hall said:His sessions aren't as long so maybe Hazany has the edge over him. Rullan doesn't do multi-layer subcision but I don't know any doctor who does. So maybe Hazany wins in this regard. But for the price??? Have at it. There are a number of people who are happy with Rullan's technique so take that for what it's worth. I don't know enough to comment on Hazany's technique but if he's going to charge that much, I'd hope to hear from more people about their results.
I've spoken to Hazany and Rullan's employees. I asked Rullan's office about the layers of subcision (after hearing about it from Hazany) and was told "he'll (Rullan) go as deep as needed for subcision. The main issue for Hazany for me was that they could not give me a somewhat accurate quote due to the variable cost from the subcision layers (the deeper the more expensive). $2.5k - $10k for just subcision was way too wide a range for me.
23 hours ago, Sirius Lee said:Second, you injected Sculptra. That alone should raise a red flag. Dermal filler, while important, is not a true solution.
Whats bad about Sculptra?
By the way, I had started treatment with Hazany but paused, I recently spoke with him and he said he's opening a new clinic and won't be doing acne scar treatments anymore soon. He said he's going to stop taking new patients for it within a couple of weeks. Other doctors will be doing scar treatments at the new clinic. Just thought it would be worth mentioning.
41 minutes ago, perdust said:I've spoken to Hazany and Rullan's employees. I asked Rullan's office about the layers of subcision (after hearing about it from Hazany) and was told "he'll (Rullan) go as deep as needed for subcision. The main issue for Hazany for me was that they could not give me a somewhat accurate quote due to the variable cost from the subcision layers (the deeper the more expensive). $2.5k - $10k for just subcision was way too wide a range for me.
Whats bad about Sculptra?
Who cares about the range. $10k is astronomical for subcision alone even for the best doctor in the world. Even at the lowest range, $2.5k is still the highest amount for subcision I've seen.These LA doctors have no shame. Not sure why they charge the most when they don't get the best results.
I'm not sure about layers of the skin for subcision but I'm pretty sure Rullan can do what Hazany can do. Rullan's been doing it for many, many more years.
I mentioned in a post many months ago that I believe some treatments are not that hard to administer. Microneedling being an easy one. Cross, as long as people know the percentages and don't color outside of the lines, doesn't require that much skill. Some of Emer's nurses do Cross on patients. This is why Hazany can probably have other people do scar treatments.
6 hours ago, Amanda Hall said:I'm not sure about layers of the skin for subcision but I'm pretty sure Rullan can do what Hazany can do. Rullan's been doing it for many, many more years.
I would like to add my own 2-cents here.
Seriously, WTF is a "layered" subcision? The whole point of subcision is to cut the scar band that's holding it down., wherever it may be. Once the fibrosis has been severed, that's it. There's no need to go back and cut them again. So what's the point of this multi-level approach?
I usually don't like being vocal about these things but OP makes it sound like this doctor is doing something special, when in fact it sounds more like a scam. Please don't become a sucker. Do your due diligence and make sure you know what you're getting.
2 hours ago, Sirius Lee said:I would like to add my own 2-cents here.
Seriously, WTF is a "layered" subcision? The whole point of subcision is to cut the scar band that's holding it down., wherever it may be. Once the fibrosis has been severed, that's it. There's no need to go back and cut them again. So what's the point of this multi-level approach?
I usually don't like being vocal about these things but OP makes it sound like this doctor is doing something special, when in fact it sounds more like a scam. Please don't become a sucker. Do your due diligence and make sure you know what you're getting.
Hey, as long as you're happy with your progress, that's what matters. Like I said before to another poster, if you think Lim or Rullan is the best choice for you, then that's where you should go. Personally, I had a terrible experience with Rullan, he worsened my scars. Not saying he did it intentionally but that was the end result. But if people are happy with his results then I don't have aproblem with it, its your money and more importantly, your face.
I can assure you though, that while Dr. Hazany is probably unaffordable to many, he's definitely not a scam, and my results as well as the results posted on his website prove that. Personally, I was way more pissed after spending money on Rullan, even though he charged me a fraction of the price, I had major buyer's regret because after all the hype on this forum about him, he did squat for my scars and I had to get the damage he did (I have before after pictures to prove this but I have no interest in trashing doctors or killing their businesses) fixed by Dr. Hazany.
3 hours ago, Sirius Lee said:I would like to add my own 2-cents here.
Seriously, WTF is a "layered" subcision? The whole point of subcision is to cut the scar band that's holding it down., wherever it may be. Once the fibrosis has been severed, that's it. There's no need to go back and cut them again. So what's the point of this multi-level approach?
I usually don't like being vocal about these things but OP makes it sound like this doctor is doing something special, when in fact it sounds more like a scam. Please don't become a sucker. Do your due diligence and make sure you know what you're getting.
This. Having seen doctors do subcision, it was just insert and cut scar bands. I didn't know about the multi-level subcision. Without being an expert on subcision, I'd guess that the doctors that have been doing this for decades know what they're doing so all the fancy jargonprobably isn't going to make me think that Hazany's technique is better.
I wouldn't go as far as to say Hazany is a scam. The issue I have is that he's not worth the money and the marketing and cost behind his treatments are to make people think that they are better than other doctors'.
1 hour ago, downinthedms said:Hey, as long as you're happy with your progress, that's what matters. Like I said before to another poster, if you think Lim or Rullan is the best choice for you, then that's where you should go. Personally, I had a terrible experience with Rullan, he worsened my scars. Not saying he did it intentionally but that was the end result. But if people are happy with his results then I don't have aproblem with it, its your money and more importantly, your face.
I can assure you though, that while Dr. Hazany is probably unaffordable to many, he's definitely not a scam, and my results as well as the results posted on his website prove that. Personally, I was way more pissed after spending money on Rullan, even though he charged me a fraction of the price, I had major buyer's regret because after all the hype on this forum about him, he did squat for my scars and I had to get the damage he did (I have before after pictures to prove this but I have no interest in trashing doctors or killing their businesses) fixed by Dr. Hazany.
I support your voicing your opinion on Hazany.
There are good and bad experiences with every doctor. The worse ones have more bad reviews and vice versa. So if you had a terrific experience with Hazany, that's great! We should all take notice and consider him as an option. But you are only providing one review. The veteran doctors have many more reviews - Rullan having many good ones.
I feel like I'm beating a dead horse but I'll say it again. Dr. Rullan has some bad reviews and he's not known for laser or fillers. I had a saline injection from him and got no results (I have a stubborn condition that's hard to treat). But it was affordable. He did Cross on me either 4 or 5 times. Didn't see results the first 3-4 times. I did with my last one (it's only been several weeks though). My worst scar looks better. My second worse scar didn't get any improvement. So, yes, I do trust Phenol Cross more than TCA Cross and I do buy what Dr. Rullan says about its efficacy and safety. I also believe some people who say that Rullan didn't do a good job. It happens with every doctor. I'm glad Hazany fixed you up.
I just don't understand how a doctor can charge so much. Is what he's doing that amazing? Like I said, I didn't know too much about Hazany before. But I haven't heard anybody else mention his name for subcision other than you. I wish there were more patient reviews about him so that people can take the leap and try him out and see if he's the real deal. My prediction is that most people can't or don't want to afford him. To all of you reading this..... every doctor has amazing results that they post online for you to see. That is not indicative of all of their results. What is the average result of a doctor? That's what you guys should expect so you won't be disappointed.
3 hours ago, Sirius Lee said:I would like to add my own 2-cents here.
Seriously, WTF is a "layered" subcision? The whole point of subcision is to cut the scar band that's holding it down., wherever it may be. Once the fibrosis has been severed, that's it. There's no need to go back and cut them again. So what's the point of this multi-level approach?
I usually don't like being vocal about these things but OP makes it sound like this doctor is doing something special, when in fact it sounds more like a scam. Please don't become a sucker. Do your due diligence and make sure you know what you're getting.
I agree. What is being done during this 4 hour subcision? My friend needed an operation, his abdomen was opened and closed and it took an hour and a half. Just for comparison..
Happy for everybody who has improvement of their scars. More power to you.
But 4 hours subcision is borderline scam..
46 minutes ago, Amanda Hall said:This. Having seen doctors do subcision, it was just insert and cut scar bands. I didn't know about the multi-level subcision. Without being an expert on subcision, I'd guess that the doctors that have been doing this for decades know what they're doing so all the fancy jargonprobably isn't going to make me think that Hazany's technique is better.
I wouldn't go as far as to say Hazany is a scam. The issue I have is that he's not worth the money and the marketing and cost behind his treatments are to make people think that they are better than other doctors'.
I support your voicing your opinion on Hazany.
There are good and bad experiences with every doctor. The worse ones have more bad reviews and vice versa. So if you had a terrific experience with Hazany, that's great! We should all take notice and consider him as an option. But you are only providing one review. The veteran doctors have many more reviews - Rullan having many good ones.
I feel like I'm beating a dead horse but I'll say it again. Dr. Rullan has some bad reviews and he's not known for laser or fillers. I had a saline injection from him and got no results (I have a stubborn condition that's hard to treat). But it was affordable. He did Cross on me either 4 or 5 times. Didn't see results the first 3-4 times. I did with my last one (it's only been several weeks though). My worst scar looks better. My second worse scar didn't get any improvement. So, yes, I do trust Phenol Cross more than TCA Cross and I do buy what Dr. Rullan says about its efficacy and safety. I also believe some people who say that Rullan didn't do a good job. It happens with every doctor. I'm glad Hazany fixed you up.
I just don't understand how a doctor can charge so much. Is what he's doing that amazing? Like I said, I didn't know too much about Hazany before. But I haven't heard anybody else mention his name for subcision other than you. I wish there were more patient reviews about him so that people can take the leap and try him out and see if he's the real deal. My prediction is that most people can't or don't want to afford him. To all of you reading this..... every doctor has amazing results that they post online for you to see. That is not indicative of all of their results. What is the average result of a doctor? That's what you guys should expect so you won't be disappointed.
It's just not a good return of investment for me. If I was convinced that I will pay 10-15k and will get 95% permanent (!) results Iwould do it,believe me. But having done subcisions /fillers /cross I am perfectly aware that the result is moderate at best and just one treatment will never cut it. At the same time there are many experienced and reputable doctors who offer the treatments at reasonable prices.Of course doctors are allowed to charge whatever prices they deem appropriate. But I think theyshouldbe doctors first, business men second, not the other way around! This doesn't mean that you shouldn't pay more for skills and expertise as with everything in life. No, Ijust think that given the moderate permanent improvement you usually get from scar treatments, crazy prices like tens of thousands of dollars are just not justified.
The people who will pay thousands of $ and when the filler dissolves won't get the promised 80%...
1 hour ago, JaysonC said:I agree. What is being done during this 4 hour subcision? My friend needed an operation, his abdomen was opened and closed and it took an hour and a half. Just for comparison..
Happy for everybody who has improvement of their scars. More power to you.
But 4 hours subcision is borderline scam..
If subcision takes that long, either that doctor is extremely meticulous, has one-of-a-kind techniques,or is just plain inefficient. Maybe the doctor is purposely making the procedure really long so that he can make you feel that he's doing more. Maybe he's not as experienced as Rullan and it takes him five times as long. I don't know but I would guess that almost everyone will consider a subcision treatment time of anything more than an hour (even 30 minutes!)is too long.
58 minutes ago, JaysonC said:It's just not a good return of investment for me. If I was convinced that I will pay 10-15k and will get 95% permanent (!) results Iwould do it,believe me. But having done subcisions /fillers /cross I am perfectly aware that the result is moderate at best and just one treatment will never cut it. At the same time there are many experienced and reputable doctors who offer the treatments at reasonable prices.Of course doctors are allowed to charge whatever prices they deem appropriate. But I think theyshouldbe doctors first, business men second, not the other way around! This doesn't mean that you shouldn't pay more for skills and expertise as with everything in life. No, Ijust think that given the moderate permanent improvement you usually get from scar treatments, crazy prices like tens of thousands of dollars are just not justified.
The people who will pay thousands of $ and when the filler dissolves won't get the promised 80%...
95% improvement to someone else could be 50% so let's keep things in perspective.
Doctors should be doctors first but once cosmetic doctors see the green, it's a different story. I believe they should be able to profit from their skills, but I also believe that there's a point where it goes too far to the disgust of some people.
We should also think about the treatments that contributed to improving these scars by "95%". Which one of those carried the most weight? If it's subcision, then props to the doctor for being skilled.If it's Cross (highly doubt), good job for choosing that. If it's filler, then can we really praise the doctor that much? Filler injection doesn't require a great deal of skill in my opinion and we'd be wasting time talking about Hazany.
4 hours ago, Amanda Hall said:This. Having seen doctors do subcision, it was just insert and cut scar bands. I didn't know about the multi-level subcision. Without being an expert on subcision, I'd guess that the doctors that have been doing this for decades know what they're doing so all the fancy jargonprobably isn't going to make me think that Hazany's technique is better.
I wouldn't go as far as to say Hazany is a scam. The issue I have is that he's not worth the money and the marketing and cost behind his treatments are to make people think that they are better than other doctors'.
I support your voicing your opinion on Hazany.
There are good and bad experiences with every doctor. The worse ones have more bad reviews and vice versa. So if you had a terrific experience with Hazany, that's great! We should all take notice and consider him as an option. But you are only providing one review. The veteran doctors have many more reviews - Rullan having many good ones.
I feel like I'm beating a dead horse but I'll say it again. Dr. Rullan has some bad reviews and he's not known for laser or fillers. I had a saline injection from him and got no results (I have a stubborn condition that's hard to treat). But it was affordable. He did Cross on me either 4 or 5 times. Didn't see results the first 3-4 times. I did with my last one (it's only been several weeks though). My worst scar looks better. My second worse scar didn't get any improvement. So, yes, I do trust Phenol Cross more than TCA Cross and I do buy what Dr. Rullan says about its efficacy and safety. I also believe some people who say that Rullan didn't do a good job. It happens with every doctor. I'm glad Hazany fixed you up.
I just don't understand how a doctor can charge so much. Is what he's doing that amazing? Like I said, I didn't know too much about Hazany before. But I haven't heard anybody else mention his name for subcision other than you. I wish there were more patient reviews about him so that people can take the leap and try him out and see if he's the real deal. My prediction is that most people can't or don't want to afford him. To all of you reading this..... every doctor has amazing results that they post online for you to see. That is not indicative of all of their results. What is the average result of a doctor? That's what you guys should expect so you won't be disappointed.
Absolutely agree. Similiar to lottery you can win once in a while but that doesnt mean everyone can win. So what is more important is how are the results across many patients. Maybe someone here who is financially well off can try and see if there is a different science to his approach and tell us. But we all know for a fact that any treatment cannot give you good results in a short time except excision where the results are apparent in 2 months or if you have very shallow scarring to begin with.
My theory is all people with scars have Lower response to collagen building and hence it takes time for them to grow collagen. And after each session with correct damage to the area needing repair causes growth of collagen slowly as that is the pace of the body. And by repeating those treatments you finally see the lifting of scars after some sessions.
2 hours ago, Amanda Hall said:If subcision takes that long, either that doctor is extremely meticulous, has one-of-a-kind techniques,or is just plain inefficient. Maybe the doctor is purposely making the procedure really long so that he can make you feel that he's doing more. Maybe he's not as experienced as Rullan and it takes him five times as long. I don't know but I would guess that almost everyone will consider a subcision treatment time of anything more than an hour (even 30 minutes!)is too long.
95% improvement to someone else could be 50% so let's keep things in perspective.
Doctors should be doctors first but once cosmetic doctors see the green, it's a different story. I believe they should be able to profit from their skills, but I also believe that there's a point where it goes too far to the disgust of some people.
We should also think about the treatments that contributed to improving these scars by "95%". Which one of those carried the most weight? If it's subcision, then props to the doctor for being skilled.If it's Cross (highly doubt), good job for choosing that. If it's filler, then can we really praise the doctor that much? Filler injection doesn't require a great deal of skill in my opinion and we'd be wasting time talking about Hazany.
Subcision for 4 hrs is insane!
For fillers you need a good injector, doesn't even need to be a doctor. They have to havea good technique as most complications are provider- and technique dependant.
I checked Dr Hazany's website - very solid looking, competent, caring doctor, has stellar reviews and by all means nothing wrong to charge more when you are good in your field, I am in favour of that. I can see why people would want to get treatment with Dr Hazany.
What I don't particularly like it that the prices for scar treatments are disproportionally high considering the results and there's also an element of marketing and 'leading the client on' (to avoid the scam word). People who have been having a few treatments know what Dr Hazany promises - 85% from his Trifecta - is close to impossible as a definite treatment at least. One time treatments don't work for scars and are mostly a marketing strategy.
Just to set the record straight, I wasn't arguing about the "Not Your Everyday Walmart Special"price. Sure, doctors are free to call whatever price they want and patients are free to spend their money however they see fit. If I can get 90% improvement after splurging $100K, I'm all for it.
My point was about the subcision TECHNIQUE and how that was touted to be so much better than the conventional method. That sounds like a dubious claim that warrants suspicion. I wouldn't bank on it.
5 hours ago, Danny562 said:I went in for my subcision yesterday. Hazany performed the procedure himself. I lost track of time so I am not sure how long I was there for.
He is located on Rodeo Drive. If you are expecting Walmart everyday low prices you are out of your mind. Calling him a scam because of the pricing isn't cool. You are tarnishing people's reputation without any actual facts... opinions are not facts. If you don't like his prices GO SOMEWHERE ELSE. He isn't the only dermatologist in LA.
I am not happy having to spend all this cash to fix my face but if I have to then I will do it. "It is what it is."
I know its early but wow, your improvement looks amazing. Did he use the taylor liberator for you? Your face looks way less swollen compared to mine post subcision, granted I probably had 10x the amount of scars as you.
In the end, the proof is in the pudding. This image just proves that.
3 hours ago, Sirius Lee said:Just to set the record straight, I wasn't arguing about the "Not Your Everyday Walmart Special" price. Sure, doctors are free to call whatever price they want and patients are free to spend their money however they see fit. If I can get 90% improvement after splurging $100K, I'm all for it.
My point was about the subcision TECHNIQUE and how that was touted to be so much better than the conventional method. That sounds like a dubious claim that warrants suspicion. I wouldn't bank on it.
Well, I can tell you based on my experience, that's exactly what it is though, his technique. TL subcision is very different from the subcision Rullan performed on me. I'm the only person here who has had procedures performed by both and trust me, the difference is night and day. It doesn't matter how deep Rullan goes, because he isn't even entering the layer of the skin that the TL subcision does. I'm one person so take my opinion with a grain of salt but now there's 2 people showing great improvement including @Danny562
2 hours ago, downinthedms said:I'm one person so take my opinion with a grain of salt but now there's 2 people showing great improvement including
2 hours ago, Danny562 said:Like you said, it is still early but I am amazed at the results also. Hazany under promised and over delivered.
Everyone here has at one time or another been head-over-heels in love with their treatment. Well, until the reality set in. That's human nature after all. We want to feel secure in the choices we've made, and that's understandable.
This is not to say I don't believe in what you say. I truly hope the treatmentworks out for both of you.
Be sure to keep us updated, especially after the 3-month mark. Good luck.
16 hours ago, Danny562 said:I went in for my subcision yesterday. Hazany performed the procedure himself. I lost track of time so I am not sure how long I was there for.
He is located on Rodeo Drive. If you are expecting Walmart everyday low prices you are out of your mind. Calling him a scam because of the pricing isn't cool. You are tarnishing people's reputation without any actual facts... opinions are not facts. If you don't like his prices GO SOMEWHERE ELSE. He isn't the only dermatologist in LA.
I am not happy having to spend all this cash to fix my face but if I have to then I will do it. "It is what it is."
How much did you pay and what treatments did you have? Just subcision?
On 7/27/2021 at 11:04 PM, downinthedms said:but I knew I had really good results within 2-3 days after the subcision itself after my swelling had gone down
It takes more than 3 days for swelling to go down and a couple of months for sculptra to be eventually absolved by the body.
23 hours ago, downinthedms said:Well, I can tell you based on my experience, that's exactly what it is though, his technique. TL subcision is very different from the subcision Rullan performed on me. I'm the only person here who has had procedures performed by both and trust me, the difference is night and day. It doesn't matter how deep Rullan goes, because he isn't even entering the layer of the skin that the TL subcision does. I'm one person so take my opinion with a grain of salt but now there's 2 people showing great improvement including @Danny562
6 hours ago, Danny562 said:Preparatory enzyme peel, phenol test spot, phenol Cross, superficial and mid-layer subcision +lightening cream, my total for all of this is $3,225.
He isn't the most affordable dermatologist out there but I do notregret my decision.
Just want to add my thoughts here:
As much as I hope you guys get the results you desire, I think it's kinda irresponsible to flat out say you don't regret your decision or that you "achieved" 95% success a couple of days after your procedure.
Someone who is browsing this forummight be gullible and rush to get thisprocedure solelybased on your day 0, post-op swelling.
I'd like to see if the results hold in 2-3 months. Hoping for the best!
1 minute ago, Danny562 said:
I completely understand what you saying but I really don't regret my decision. After receiving my phenol Cross I notice an improvement in my appearance. That alone gave me satisfactory results. I also never claimed "95% success."
If you are browsing these forums without doing your research and you get scammed, that is you problem, not mine.
Yeah I was referring to the original poster who claimed 95% improvements.
This is why I don't like threads that gives false hope sincethere are teenagers who browse this forums. (I was one of them).When I was a teenager, I was super gullible to anything I read online and at some point begged my parents to get this procedure (but now I'm glad they didn't, I would have wasted tons of money for the flight and cost of this procedure for some laser):
There was a lot of hype about it. He claims he achieved 75% improvements and that his shallow scars disappeared.
Here's a pic of him now2020: https://www.instagram.com/p/CDHTYSOFy_H/
Does this look like he got 75% improvements10 years post op?