5 hours ago, gantz said:

Because Cytrellis didn't said that it will definetly hit the market in 2021 ;( Last news on their website was in April of this year and did not concern their products (this was an interview with their head on an abstract topic)

How can microneedling make scars worse? I don't understand. After all, the needles are very thin, thinner than microcoring needles (which are perceived by many as a potential scar treatment)

 

Also, why you prefer dermapen over roller?

they have been doing research for a long time.I think it will come out soon

who knows what is the procedure?

From june

37 minutes ago, AlexZ77 said:

From june

Well Lets hope it will Be worth it

7 hours ago, AlexZ77 said:

From june

Ðака …ооˆÐ° ново‚и!!!

Guys, so I really want to know about Gemstone Biotheraputics. Essentially, they got a pig skin to heal with no scarring with their Hydrogel and they are on 510K track for the FDA. This means they technically don't need clinical data to put it on the market, but I was listening to a podcast where their CEO (Emily English) said they were doing clinical trials to show proof of concept still in human subjects. On the clinical trials website they did have a public human trial in which was supposed to end in May 2020. There have been no updates on results and when I contacted the company, it was said that Emily English is no longer with the company. I contacted Sharon Grecht the person who created the hydrogel to see whats up.

23 hours ago, AlexZ77 said:

From june

when did you ask? this is already an archive right? you didn't ask yesterday, right?

3 hours ago, Didikaxonim said:

when did you ask? this is already an archive right? you didn't ask yesterday, right?

May asked , june answered , you have it written there

7 hours ago, Miro said:

May asked , june answered , you have it written there

thanks

1 hour ago, Didikaxonim said:

Its In azbuka , mind to translate ?

56 minutes ago, Miro said:

Its In azbuka , mind to translate ?

this is the result of a laser after 5 months.it will be a good result from almost all patients of this doctor

Fractional CO2 Lasers in general have very good results for superficial things, they also have this ablation factor, which is very important in acne scars revision, however it does practicaly nothing to Ice picks, and if scars are tethered it wont cut tethers .

Do not trust lasers .... very dangerous.

I Dont see anything mindblowing on these pics , theres a Lot of diff lightning and angle

Swelling is deceiving. No to Lasers

Can we all group together to update on latest developments? I've been looking everywhere for updates. Still waiting on Gemstone...PIRL laser is one I found where it can cut out scar tissue and not cause other tissue damage, but it won't be doing clinical trials for at least to 2-3 years.

27 minutes ago, yepitsmewee said:

Can we all group together to update on latest developments? I've been looking everywhere for updates. Still waiting on Gemstone...PIRL laser is one I found where it can cut out scar tissue and not cause other tissue damage, but it won't be doing clinical trials for at least to 2-3 years.

 

Well if u cut out the scar tissue , you have to replace it with something.

those results above are incredibleactually, looks like it was manipulated, if not, unbelievable good.

11 minutes ago, De Rerum Natura said:

those results above are incredibleactually, looks like it was manipulated, if not, unbelievable good.

these patients also said very good words.There is also a result after 3 years

Micro, the laser cuts tissue you without causing damage to any surrounding tissues. You'd glue it together with adhesive.

1 hour ago, yepitsmewee said:

Micro, the laser cuts tissue you without causing damage to any surrounding tissues. You'd glue it together with adhesive.

There is still a scar after this. I've read the procedure. It is an ablative nonetheless even if it's not as intense as other lasers. The incisions heal with scars(fibrosis) not regenerated tissue.

The laser byDwayne Miller? I emailed him and he said it was scarless.

4 hours ago, yepitsmewee said:

The laser byDwayne Miller? I emailed him and he said it was scarless.

He's lying bro, do your research(it's even called a near scarless technique because of its microscarring). That's all I'll say, if you want to go for it then I wish you the very best.

Ablatives burn tissue and cause scars, you could be as precise as you want, the scars will still form.

http://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/307498/files/ooi130043.pdf%3Fsubformat%3Dpdfa&ved=2ahUKEwicmdOWidnrAhU4VBUIHWh0AUI4MhAWMAB6BAgCEAE&usg=AOvVaw1FLVjjmsvzZEYLkjHTHhb 0" rel="external nofollow"> https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/307498/files/ooi130043.pdf%3Fsubformat%3Dpdfa&ved=2ahUKEwicmdOWidnrAhU4VBUIHWh0AUI4MhAWMAB6BAgCEAE&usg=AOvVaw1FLVjjmsvzZEYLkjHTHhb0

That's a paper on his device with his name on it, do a quick search of "scar" and tell me what you find.

8 hours ago, David4bay said:

He's lying bro, do your research(it's even called a near scarless technique because of its microscarring). That's all I'll say, if you want to go for it then I wish you the very best.

Ablatives burn tissue and cause scars, you could be as precise as you want, the scars will still form.

http://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/307498/files/ooi130043.pdf%3Fsubformat%3Dpdfa&ved=2ahUKEwicmdOWidnrAhU4VBUIHWh0AUI4MhAWMAB6BAgCEAE&usg=AOvVaw1FLVjjmsvzZEYLkjHTHhb 0" rel="external nofollow"> https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/307498/files/ooi130043.pdf%3Fsubformat%3Dpdfa&ved=2ahUKEwicmdOWidnrAhU4VBUIHWh0AUI4MhAWMAB6BAgCEAE&usg=AOvVaw1FLVjjmsvzZEYLkjHTHhb0

 

That's a paper on his device with his name on it, do a quick search of "scar" and tell me what you find.

Yes