On 11/06/2016 at 8:15 AM, mjg713 said:

This is an interesting article: https://www.yahoo.com/tech/heal-burn-over-weekend-skin-124712275.html

Isnt that recell? It's been out for very long

Someone here told me that the word "scarless" has 2 meanings. The first is healing without a scar, the second is reducing scarring. I just read a few dictionaries, here is the definition that have all of them:

Definitions
Collins English Dictionary
adjective

1.lackingascarorblemish
2.tendingto leave no scar or blemish

12 hours ago, bloodwar44 said:

On 11. juni 2016 at 2:15 AM, mjg713 said:

This is an interesting article: https://www.yahoo.com/tech/heal-burn-over-weekend-skin-124712275.html

Isnt that recell? It's been out for very long

I hope not! Does anyone know? Recell has not been much of a success story, has it? On their website it says they are going for a PDA now, so it isnt even out yet.

http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/renovacell-skin-regeneration-technology-improves-pigmentation-appearance-scars-2117013.htm

It looks like the video of the SkinGun was too optimistic. The skin didnt heal in 4 days and it didnt give full re-pigmentation either. Which again of course means that it wont fix acne scars.

How does everyone feel about tanning if you have scars on your face? Do you avoid the sun because you think the scars become more noticeable, or do you tan your face because you feel like they become less noticeable?

http://www.mebo-international.com/article/dr-xus-announcement-his-accomplished-organ-regeneration-technologies-humans

Hey guys, look at this very interesting website. They claim to be able to have scarless healing. They have some very compelling evidence
which shows third degree burns and other various forms of scars that regenerate perfectly or close to?

Please someone look at this and tell me what you think. I have a feeling that maybe seabs was right all along and that scarless healing does exists but might be suppressed by governments and other institutions.

26 minutes ago, AI3forever said:

http://www.mebo-international.com/article/dr-xus-announcement-his-accomplished-organ-regeneration-technologies-humans

Hey guys, look at this very interesting website. They claim to be able to have scarless healing. They have some very compelling evidence
which shows third degree burns and other various forms of scars that regenerate perfectly or close to?

Please someone look at this and tell me what you think. I have a feeling that maybe seabs was right all along and that scarless healing does exists but might be suppressed by governments and other institutions.

This is definitely impressive, but it's not "scar free." I can still see a scar in the after pictures.

1 hour ago, CollegeKidd said:

1 hour ago, AI3forever said:

http://www.mebo-international.com/article/dr-xus-announcement-his-accomplished-organ-regeneration-technologies-humans

Hey guys, look at this very interesting website. They claim to be able to have scarless healing. They have some very compelling evidence
which shows third degree burns and other various forms of scars that regenerate perfectly or close to?

Please someone look at this and tell me what you think. I have a feeling that maybe seabs was right all along and that scarless healing does exists but might be suppressed by governments and other institutions.

This is definitely impressive, but it's not "scar free." I can still see a scar in the after pictures.

This is fake Chinese i have seen them before and look at the pictures they are from the 80's.

Keep the hopes up, gemstone claims to have the potential to regenerate even hair follicle
http://www.folliclethought.com/tag/gemstone-biotherapeutics/

23 hours ago, Keeping_up said:

This is fake Chinese i have seen them before and look at the pictures they are from the 80's.

They look pretty genuine and the pictures don't look like the 80s

Just read this: http://www.news-medical.net/news/20160708/New-topical-film-patch-can-effectively-close-dermal-wounds-reduce-scarring.aspx . Seems interesting and similar to hydrogel.

http://sciencenewsjournal.com/3d-printing-living-tissue-stem-cell-bio-ink/

Any new from Gemstone about human trials? It is so frustrating waiting for this because it seems like this is our most promising option. Has everyone just lost hope?

Their latest new suggest that their biosynthetic scaffold has the potential to even restore hair...
A hair restoration expert by the name of Marc Dauer was appointed as their advisor..

In their latest interview with folliclethought.. they were able to not only regenerate dermis but also hair follicle

Source : http://www.folliclethought.com/tag/gemstone-biotherapeutics/

The problem is, it does not state in what? in humans or pigs or mice?

Pigs

Unfortunately this can still fail in humans. Although pig skin is close it is not genetically identical to human skin. I really would like to know when they start these human trials.

Thanks for the updates! I check this forum at least once a week. I really hope the hydrogel or sunogel work on humans!! Ughhh, I'm getting so impatient tho!

Been an avid follower/reader since I was plagued with scars in 2010. Glad to see that, there's a lot more improvement in the hydrogel technology!! And the amount of other research in scarless healing! Hope the human tests go just as well!!

The waiting is hard. Very hard. Especially when you dont know if it is going to work or when it will be available. I tell myself that it will be successful and ready for treatment in 5 years time. Hopefully.

Can someone please explain how the gel will work? Does it give the skin the perfect environment to grow? And stem cells are also a part of the process?

7 minutes ago, Frasier said:

The waiting is hard. Very hard. Especially when you dont know if it is going to work or when it will be available. I tell myself that it will be successful and ready for treatment in 5 years time. Hopefully.

Can someone please explain how the gel will work? Does it give the skin the perfect environment to grow? And stem cells are also a part of the process?

I agree! But since it's considered to be a medical device, it might be available waaay before that! Keep your hopes up mate! We're all waiting! Human trials will be starting soon (hopefully)!!

I'm assuming it's more of a sheet than an actual hair gel. Like a wrap or maybe something like a thicker mask? I'm assuming based on those hydrogel face masks that many people are using rn. Application might vary but they can ablate deeply/remove the skin and then apply the gel. I think removing the scar tissue would be trickier compared to the hydrogel application itself. It has been proven to grow skin back w/o scars, and since it's successful in the porcine models, I am certain it will work on humans as well. I mean, we're currently using organs and even have skin grafts from pigs lmao (google!), so why wouldn't it work?

Nope they're not. I don't think you'll need stem cell treatment if you're going the Hydrogel route. Might be redundant! But there are other scientists experimenting around w stem cells and there was an article posted a few pages back stating that they have managed to (a) reverse ageing and (b) regrow skin w stem cells! Loads of options! Loads of studies this direction, it's only a matter of time! I do hope they're available before I turn 26 (4 years lol). I've spent a decade mourning my skin. I want another decade of happiness before the inevitable skin ageing sets in!

Skin ageing will no longer become inevitable in 20 years or so... they could even reverse aging by then
..

On July 14, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Frasier said:

The waiting is hard. Very hard. Especially when you dont know if it is going to work or when it will be available. I tell myself that it will be successful and ready for treatment in 5 years time. Hopefully.

Can someone please explain how the gel will work? Does it give the skin the perfect environment to grow? And stem cells are also a part of the process?

When we are born in the fetus we heal scar free, when we are adults we heal with a scar. The hydrogel is suppose to mimic the fetal wound environment. We scar as the bodies evolutionary reaction to healing a wound very fast (i.e. from a tiger bite or arrow) to prevent infection and close the found very fast. The hydrogel is suppose to negate this and let the wound heal in the optimal setting and completely regenerating the skin instead of scarring. To my knowledge, there is no stem cells involved. So you are correct about the hydrogel giving the wound a "perfect environment to grow".

I read an article about the hydrogel recently that stated that when they did the pig experiment it did not produce sebaceous glands or grow hair. Did they redo the experiment to fix this? if not i'm assuming this can mean a possible not so good result for humans if they can't regenerate these characteristics in pigs?