Does anyone have any idea when they are going to announce that they have started human trials? Does anyone know of similar scar treatments that were successful on say pigs and failed in humans? Also, can someone explain this: If there is a scar across a joint such as a knee and the scar is excised and hydrogel applied, will the skin grow back also with full function? I'm really hoping this isn't simply too good to be true.
15 hours ago, rudy1986 said:
This is exciting news, it seems as though this is very similar to hydrogel and this will be the future of scarless healing. It is also nice to see that it is being carried out by Harvard. It seems as though it is already being successfully used on humans. I just hope something like this can start being used clinically for us in a reasonable amount of time and not 10-20 years from now.
No one has answered this but does anyone know how this will affect internal scar tissue. For example say you have a scar with internal scar tissue which limits motion, I assume you would excise the scar and internal scar tissue and then let it heal with the hydrogel. The theory being that when it reheats their won't be any scar tissue at all?
12 hours ago, rudy1986 said:Simply not that way, trust me
I'm sorry, I don't understand your response? One thing i'm also confused about hydrogel is how is it suppose to stay in position? Like say it has to stay on a wound on your face for 14 days for the area to re-epithelize, does it just stick on?
Anyone have an idea when they are suppose to update us on the human trials? and from my understanding is if it works we will have to wait another year for the FDA to approve it for clinical use? The waiting is just frustrating, but it would be nice at least to know that there is light at the end of the tunnel. Also, I am wondering how they would apply this inplastic surgery. For example, scars from a facelift.
2 hours ago, mjg713 said:Anyone have an idea when they are suppose to update us on the human trials? and from my understanding is if it works we will have to wait another year for the FDA to approve it for clinical use? The waiting is just frustrating, but it would be nice at least to know that there is light at the end of the tunnel. Also, I am wondering how they would apply this inplastic surgery. For example, scars from a facelift.
quickly be done with it
There is, regarding clinical trials, they have partnership with Winthrop University
This is an interesting article: https://www.yahoo.com/tech/heal-burn-over-weekend-skin-124712275.html
8 hours ago, Frasier said:That must be good news? It should be able to fix acne scars, shouldnt it?
It seems like it should. Articles like these make me believe that scientists know a lot more about scarless healing than we think. I'm just hoping something can be released in a somewhat timely matter and not 20 years or more.
On their website it says that they have already tried it on a dozen people with great results. It even worked on 2nd degree burn victim. So this must work on acne scars, if I am not completely wrong. And they are waiting for an FDA approval now. How long time will that take?
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2016/06/prweb13489347.htm
Gemstone hair restoration potential
Any thoughts guys?
6 hours ago, rudy1986 said:http://www.prweb.com/releases/2016/06/prweb13489347.htmGemstone hair restoration potential
Any thoughts guys?
This is interesting but wouldn't it make more sense for them to focus on healing scars in humans first? Did they even attempt human trials yet? and they are already moving on to hair restoration?
8 hours ago, mjg713 said:This is interesting but wouldn't it make more sense for them to focus on healing scars in humans first? Did they even attempt human trials yet? and they are already moving on to hair restoration?
probably they have somehow tested on humans and saw great potential for regeneration of skin appendages, not just partial skin regeneration like Integra
Gene identified for scar less healing.