Acne.org Products
11 hours ago, De Rerum Natura said:I almost cried reading this notice
Glad it made you happy .... hopefully it's soon for us mate.
27 minutes ago, David4bay said:For those keen on microcoring, the pdf document "1044-Compte-rendu-ASLMS-2019" discusses a 20 person trial on scars and results. It works. Be patient.
So Microcoring actually get rid of scar tissue ? ... or only reduces it ? thank you for the link mate.
13 minutes ago, Scarcure said:So Microcoring actually get rid of scar tissue ? ... or only reduces it ? thank you for the link mate.
It's the same thing, don't confuse yourself. its a tissue extraction device. Scars don't proliferate(except keloids and hypertrophic scars) so extracting that tissue reduces it, and with subsequent removals and accuracy it may remove the tissue completely or beyond the range you can see.
13 minutes ago, David4bay said:It's the same thing, don't confuse yourself. its a tissue extraction device. Scars don't proliferate(except keloids and hypertrophic scars) so extracting that tissue reduces it, and with subsequent removals and accuracy it may remove the tissue completely or beyond the range you can see.
Am not , because reduction from am perspective implies it can't be removed but the scar tissue can have a softer look ( meaning it won't go away but it looks " better " ) when i use the word remove i meant with enough treatments your skin is back it its original form ( meaning before the scar occurred )
Like dermaroller for example .... it can reduce the look of the scar tissue , however it can't remove it .... to remove means for your skin to basically go back to pre scarred skin.
https://newatlas.com/science/scar-free-wound-healing-adult-skin/ Same story , but this has got me optimistic 
2 hours ago, Scarcure said:Am not , because reduction from am perspective implies it can't be removed but the scar tissue can have a softer look ( meaning it won't go away but it looks " better " ) when i use the word remove i meant with enough treatments your skin is back it its original form ( meaning before the scar occurred )
Like dermaroller for example .... it can reduce the look of the scar tissue , however it can't remove it .... to remove means for your skin to basically go back to pre scarred skin.
So to reduce something to you means to make it softer?
I kind of get where you're going but this isn't a microneedle or dermabrading tool, and you've been told this for a while now.
Look, I'll be real with you like I am with everyone here. I can't give you definite answers apart from the source which says scars were reduced, and this reduction is from that scarred tissue being extracted fractionally 9-10% by treatments so either way the tech will be out soon for all to see. Reverting skin from scarred healing to minimise scarring is good news but you should know better that the tech will be decades away if not more with a lot of safety regulations on specific use-case scenerios.
8 minutes ago, David4bay said:So to reduce something to you means to make it softer?
I kind of get where you're going but this isn't a microneedle or dermabrading tool, and you've been told this for a while now.
Look, I'll be real with you like I am with everyone here. I can't give you definite answers apart from the source which says scars were reduced, and this reduction is from that scarred tissue being extracted fractionally 9-10% by treatments so either way the tech will be out soon for all to see. Reverting skin from scarred healing to minimise scarring is good news but you should know better that the tech will be decades away if not more with a lot of safety regulations on specific use-case scenerios.
I want to know something here , what makes you assume that technology of scarred skin being reverted to scar free non blemished skin will be decades away , that is an assumption without any basis what so ever , am sorry and with all due respect to you , you're not a biologist , a skin expert or a scientist .... so to make assumptions of time frames like that isn't helping.
@gantz Was looking for more studies of micro-excisional treatments and tech.
20 minutes ago, David4bay said:@gantz Was looking for more studies of micro-excisional treatments and tech.
when was this photo published? for a long time?
5 hours ago, F1racer said:There is something I am not understanding. If the scientists behind Cytrellis know that a scar occurs in a wound diametergreater than 400 - 500 microns (0.4-0.5 mm)then why are they using 22 gauge sizeneedles which are 0.7mm?
Their modified needles extract 0.5mm cores of full thickness skin, the extra .2mm might be from the hollow needle diameter.
6 hours ago, Scarcure said:
2 hours ago, Scarcure said:
Stop posting the same news
OliX Pharmaceuticals are now set to enterStage II clinical trials forOLX10010to see if it reduces the recurrence of hypertrophic scars after surgery.
https://www.pharmanewsdaily.com/olix-pharmaceuticals-seeks-fda-nod-for-phase-2a-trial-of-olx10010/
Mini handheld microbiopsy device that heals scarlessly. Takes 0.15mm x 0.4mm. Currently geared towards diagnostic tissue sampling. But perhaps could eventually be useful to us in terms of DIY scar management.
https://newatlas.com/microbiopsy-device-skin-cancer/54154/
16 hours ago, F1racer said:Mini handheld microbiopsy device that heals scarlessly. Takes 0.15mm x 0.4mm. Currently geared towards diagnostic tissue sampling. But perhaps could eventually be useful to us in terms of DIY scar management.
https://newatlas.com/microbiopsy-device-skin-cancer/54154/
Interesting but it only removes skin at a depth of 0.4mm atm and accuracy might be a problem looking at its design.
Yeah, that isn't really made for us. At 0.4mm it would only really removesurface damage like scarred pores. I'm more interested in itas a proof that a manual microbiopsy works and is scarless. The company that is producing it is looking to come out with a range of microsampling tools so I'll keep it earmarked to see if they come up with anything more suitable for us.
A lil question guys, kinda forgot to ask: where exactly are we supposed to look for the elastagen papers once they're published? I'm particularly interested in what it'll mean for stretch marks. Thank you.