The following side effects are expected during the laser treatment course. Contact your doctor if these symptoms are severe and/or do not go away:
How Common (based on clinical studies)
| Mild redness | Up to 100% of all users |
| Swelling | Up to 100% of all users |
| Pain | Up to 100% of all users |
| Flare-up of pustular lesions | Up to 33.3% of all users |
| Pigmentary changes | Up to 16.7% of all users |
| Flare-up of papular lesions | Up to 12.5% of all users |
| Blisters | Up to 4.3% of all users |
| Vesicles | Up to 3.7% of all users |
| Purpura | Up to 2.4% of all users |
| Itching | Up to 2.4% of all users |
| Dryness of skin | Up to 2.4% of all users |
| Dryness of lips | Up to 2.4% of all users |
| Watery eye | Up to 2.4% of all users |
Laser treatment may also cause other side effects that are not mentioned here. Contact your doctor if you experience any other troublesome symptoms after laser treatment.
References
- Bernstein EF. A pilot investigation comparing low-energy, double pass 1,450 nm laser treatment of acne to conventional single-pass, high-energy treatment. Lasers Surg Med. 39(2), 193-8 (2007).
- Bernstein EF. Double-pass, low-fluence laser treatment using a large spot-size 1,450 nm laser improves acne. Lasers Surg Med. 41(2), 116-21 (2009).
- Haedersdal M, Togsverd-Bo K, Wiegell SR, Wulf HC. Long-pulsed dye laser versus long-pulsed dye laser-assisted photodynamic therapy for acne vulgaris: A randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 58(3), 387-94 (2008).
- Kwon HH, Choi SC, Jung JY, Bae YI, Park GH. Comparison of novel dual mode vs conventional single pass of a 1450-nm diode laser in the treatment of acne vulgaris for Korean patients: A 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 17(6), 1063-1068 (2018)
- Lekwuttikarn R, Tempark T, Chatproedprai S, Wananukul S. Randomized, controlled trial split-faced study of 595-nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of acne vulgaris and acne erythema in adolescents and early adulthood. Int J Dermatol. 56(8), 884-888 (2017).
- Moneib H, Tawfik AA, Youssef SS, Fawzy MM. Randomized split-face controlled study to evaluate 1550-nm fractionated erbium glass laser for treatment of acne vulgaris–an image analysis evaluation. Dermatol Surg. 40(11), 1191-200 (2014).
- Orringer JS, Kang S, Maier L, Johnson TM, Sachs DL, Karimipour DJ, Helfrich YR, Hamilton T, Voorhees JJ. A randomized, controlled, split-face clinical trial of 1320-nm Nd:YAG laser therapy in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 56(3),432-8 (2007).
- Seaton ED, Charakida A, Mouser PE, Grace I, Clement RM, Chu AC. Pulsed-dye laser treatment for inflammatory acne vulgaris: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 362(9393), 1347-52 (2003).
- Voravutinon N, Rojanamatin J, Sadhwani D, Iyengar S, Alam M. A Comparative Split-Face Study Using Different Mild Purpuric and Subpurpuric Fluence Level of 595-nm Pulsed-Dye Laser for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acne Vulgaris. Dermatol Surg 42(3), 403-9 (2016).
- Wang SQ, Counters JT, Flor ME, Zelickson BD. Treatment of inflammatory facial acne with the 1,450 nm diode laser alone versus microdermabrasion plus the 1,450 nm laser: a randomized, split-face trial. Dermatol Surg. 32(2), 249-55; discussion 255 (2006).
- Yeung CK, Shek SY, Yu CS, Kono T, Chan HH. Treatment of inflammatory facial acne with 1,450-nm diode laser in type IV to V Asian skin using an optimal combination of laser parameters. Dermatol Surg. 35(4), 593-600 (2009).
- Jung JY, Choi YS, Yoon MY, Min SU, Suh DH. Comparison of a pulsed dye laser and a combined 585/1,064-nm laser in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Dermatol Surg. 35(8), 1181-7 (2009).
- Konishi N, Endo H, Oiso N, Kawara S, Kawada A. Acne phototherapy with a 1450-nm diode laser: an open study. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 3(1), 205-9 (2007).
- Uebelhoer NS, Bogle MA, Dover JS, Arndt KA, Rohrer TE. Comparison of stacked pulses versus double-pass treatments of facial acne with a 1,450-nm laser. Dermatol Surg. 33(5), 552-9 (2007).