Does anyone have an opinion as to why one needs to have constant peels or dermabrasions to keep the skin looking good.. I mean, once the scars have diminished what reason is there for them to go back to the way they looked before. The skins DNA doesn`t know where the scars were and how deep, its just typical isn`t it, another kick in the head when y9ou are looking for a solution
James,
Are you saying a mutation occurs and if a drop of my blood were taken, given the scientists knew where to look, they would be able to tell from my DNA where I had a scar? Do you have anything to support this because I find it extremely difficult to believe?
Thanks, Anna
What I am saying is that skin is made up of cells. And Cells have memories.
I'm not a sceintist or expert in this but I have read that a cell that is injured retains the dna memory of that injury.
This would also seem to make sense in regard to the persons initial questions. I have had scars vanish with a hosts of treatments I have done, including dermabrasion, CO2 Laser, and others, only to have the same scar reappear ( but smaller) up to a year later in the same exact spot.
James
James,
I think what you may have read is that instead of DNA the dermis, once injured, has a permanently altered matrix in that it often cannot, by itself, revert to its uninjured state. With deep re-injury the matrix can be altered again to provide a more uniform appearance. in the world of current technology this would be done with something very invasive like dermabrasion, laser treatment, or a chemical peel. This has nothing to do with permanently altered DNA. Otherwise, the child of an injured parent could inherit that injury.
I think your point is valid though.
Thanks, Anna