tabula_rasa

With 20% random coverage in 2 separate treatments, 4% of skin would get a double hit, 64% would not be hit at all, and 32% would be hit once. Middle school math. In theory, you never get to 100% cov...

so who is going to be the brave sole to try re:pair first? I nominate.....*drumroll*...... "TheyCanBeCured"! Anyone second that? 😉

imagine how unlucky you'd feel if you had 6 fraxels and each mtz hit exactly the same spot everytime! doh!

yeah, surely repeat wounding of the same point within too short a timeframe must be undesirable. and i guess this must happen with fraxel but the probability for overlap is low due to the low percent...

I guess the minimum period is to ensure that the previous wounds have healed well enough to be able to epithealise the next set of wounds?   Does anyone understand the mechanism of the maximum pe...

Has anyone here had results comparable to any of the 'before and after' photos published by the Fraxel company for acne scarring? I've had my 3rd Fraxel 1500 tx today with supposedly "the best" doct...

Has anyone here had results comparable to any of the 'before and after' photos published by the Fraxel company for acne scarring?

I was able to find the following study on the new Fraxel 3 laser that totally ablates (destroys) the dermal tissue with Co2. Interesting paper, thanks punkboy. This is for fractional CO2? I don...