Jump to content

SweetJade1980

Member Since 19 Oct 2002
Offline Last Active Private

Posts I've Made

In Topic: S.B. 3002 Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010

17 March 2010 - 11:45 AM


QUOTE
See, you completely ignore the most important part of the bill and instead post a bunch of conspiracy nonsense and other b.s. about how we will no longer be able to take the doses we want to.

You dismiss the whole proprietary blend thing as unimportant, when in face it is a big problem.  As I said, I can sell ANYTHING I want to and claim it does ANYTHING I want it to as long as I sell it as a dietary supplement.  Furthermore I wouldn't have to tell anyone what is in the product as long as I hit it behind the "proprietary blend" label.  Maybe you have full faith that Whole Foods is some kind of altruist and would never sell you anything with a shady label or poor science too support the efficacy of the supplement.  After all, they aren't one of the "evil" corporations that only care about money and profits?  Oh wait, they are.

Also a proprietary blend doesn't have to list the ingredients or the amounts of the ingredients.  A normal product label doesn't even have to list the amount of the ingredients, they just list them in order from highest to lowest concentration.

You may do some research on supplements before taking them, but I know plenty of people who don't do any research and will take whatever they find if they think it will help them.  They are the ones who really get screwed by proprietary blend labeling.


Facts are a very important thing here.  If anyone can direct me to specific regulations please do so.  Here's the informatin that should cover your concern:

QUOTE
§6. Statements of Nutritional Support.
Section 403® (21 U.S.C. 343®) is amended by adding at the end the following:

"(6) For purposes of paragraph ®(1)(B), a statement for a dietary supplement may be made if -
"(A) the statement claims a benefit related to a classical nutrient deficiency disease and discloses the prevalence of such disease in the United States, describes the role of a nutrient or dietary ingredient intended to affect the structure or function in humans, characterizes the documented mechanism by which a nutrient or dietary ingredient acts to maintain such structure or function, or describes general well-being from consumption of a nutrient or dietary ingredient,
"(B) the manufacturer of the dietary supplement has substantiation that such statement is truthful and not misleading, and
"© the statement contains, prominently displayed and in boldface type, the following: "This statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.".
A statement under this subparagraph may not claim to diagnose, mitigate, treat, cure, or prevent a specific disease or class of diseases. If the manufacturer of a dietary supplement proposes to make a statement described in the first sentence of this subparagraph in the labeling of the dietary supplement, the manufacturer shall notify the Secretary no later than 30 days after the first marketing of the dietary supplement with such statement that such a statement is being made.".


§7. Dietary Supplement Ingredient Labeling and Nutrition Information Labeling.
(a) MISBRANDED SUPPLEMENTS. - Section 403 (21 U.S.C. 343) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(s) If -
"(1) it is a dietary supplement; and
"(2)(A) the label or labeling of the supplement fails to list -
"(i) the name of each ingredient of the supplement that is described in section 201(ff); and
"(ii)(I) the quantity of each such ingredient; or
"(II) with respect to a proprietary blend of such ingredients, the total quantity of all ingredients in the blend;
"(B) the label or labeling of the dietary supplement fails to identify the product by using the term `dietary supplement', which term may be modified with the name of such an ingredient;
"© the supplement contains an ingredient described in section 201(ff)(1)©, and the label or labeling of the supplement fails to identify any part of the plant from which the ingredient is derived;
"(D) the supplement -
"(i) is covered by the specifications of an official compendium;
"(ii) is represented as conforming to the specifications of an official compendium; and
"(iii) fails to so conform; or
"(E) the supplement -
"(i) is not covered by the specifications of an official compendium; and
"(ii)(I) fails to have the identity and strength that the supplement is represented to have; or
"(II) fails to meet the quality (including tablet or capsule disintegration), purity, or compositional specifications, based on validated assay or other appropriate methods, that the supplement is represented to meet.".


DSHEA Act of 1994

HTH  wink.gif


SJ

In Topic: S.B. 3002 Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010

17 March 2010 - 11:24 AM

Ahh, OK...I understand the concern....I am not dismissing anything.  I mentioned the points that I thought were important (i.e. natural flavorings, proprietary blends), but those points alone are not a reason to pass a bill that would alter other benefits that supplements provide us.  You don't approve a bill if there is fault with it.  Instead, you adjust the proposed bill so that your concerns are met, but they don't cause harm to the industry and most importantly...the consumer.

As it is now, you cannot saying anything about a supplement.  You cannot make medical or disease claims, even if it they were true, or the FDA will crack down on you. It is already in effect and the FDA has done so to both supplement manufacturers (New Chapter, Garden of Life) and food manufacturers (General Mills, Dannon).  Not because the products don't contain the ingredients listed that would be beneficial for a health condition, but because it would then be considered a drug...

I do not believe in conspiracy theories.  I believe that knowledge is power and the more we as consumers know, the more informed we are, the better we can be at effecting change.  So write, better yet call, your senators and tell them what you like about the bill and what you do not.

Again, there is currently regulation to support everything that the DSSA (and now possibly a revised S.510) was trying to accomplish, minus the nasty stuff.  From all the manufacturers that I have trained with (just like pharmaceutical companies do trainings)...there is documentation:

  • Some don't actually just base their formulations off of studies, but actuallly conduct their own studies on the product lines.  
  • Others actually will test the effectiveness of their formulations for several years before they release it into the public.  
  • Thanks to technology, there are those that do guarantee potency of a product at expiration date (applies more so to probiotics).
  • Whether the raw materials are coming from the U.S., China, Canada, New Zealand or Norway, they also incorporate rigourous 3rd party standards for testing the safety and purity of the products.
  • Amazingly some companies will opt to not buy raw materials from China (sometimes they are the only producer) if they can get it elsewhere.  The benefit may be less lead in the materials, which costs more, but at least that company knows they are selling a purer product to the consumer.
  • They maintain lot numbers so that if there is a problem, they can go back and test that lot to see if that lot indeed was faulty.
  • All supplement manufacturers are required to be apart of the Good Manufacturing Practices regulation, so quality standards will be in place for all.


I have no idea what Whole Foods standards are for selling supplements, but I know that Sunflower Markets and Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, go through several panels and wait many months or even years before we (natural grocers) will approve a product for sale on our shelves.  This may disappoint some consumers, but it's because we want to insure the quality and integrity of the products we sell. If a company were to change their forumalutions (and they do so without telling us), we willl pull it from our shelves if it contains an additive or an ingredient we do not sell.

Again, everything that I hear frustration about in this thread is already being regulated or can be.  The FDA just needs the manpower and resources (shutting down labs does not do anyone good) to do their job, not just in the food industry, but also in the supplement industry. So perhaps we should also write our congressmen about that. Below are regulations currently in place:

  • The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA)
    DSHEA Act and labeling requirements
  • Dietary Supplement and Non-Prescription Drug Consumer Protection Act, S. 3546, 2006 (“the SAER bill”) The SAER Bill
  • Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations, 2007 (GMP, cGMP) - There are supplement manufacturers that have followed these practices for over 10 years prior to the FDAs final ruling. http://www.cgmp.com
  • United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Verificaiton - Voluntary participation (but it has been used to test ingredients in China since 2007)  USP Verifed - see list of companies participating


All the best,


SJ

In Topic: S.B. 3002 Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010

17 March 2010 - 02:54 AM

I have no idea what supplements people are purchasing but if they are sold in a reputable grocery/health food store, they are labeled.  The only catch is the "proprietary blend" which will list the ingredients but not give us a specific amount for each ingredient, instead you get a total amount.

If CODEX were to become apart of the U.S. regulatory system, you could not take 100mg of Vitamin C at any frequency you choose because you are only limited to a certain number of pills per bottle.  IF these fall under a prescription, you will run out of your prescription within a matter of days if you are taking 1000mg - 3000mg or more a day of Vitamin C. Not to mention the high level of cost either method will impose on the consumer.  eusa_naughty.gif


Sadly, it ain't over....

Ever hear of S. 510? Well, it's McCain's Food Safety bill (most bills may have some good intentions, but there's also the bad). Apparently, his focus will go back to this bill which has been stalled for a few months now.  I haven't been able find this letter that is mentioned, but apparently, they are going to combine the Food Safety bill so that it includes parts of the DSSA:


McCain/Dorgan Anti-DSHEA bill dies… or does it?

Dietary Supplements, Clean Foods Next Victims of Fake "Safety" Bills

(you can sign the above petition if you like)

One more thing, I had a customer come up asking for a specific form of vitamin B6, Pyridoxamine.  We looked at all the bottles on shelves and among the three main forms of B6 in nature, pyridoxamine was not one of them on our shelves. I was disheartened so I hopped on the Internet to see if any of the brands we carry offer this supplement.  Sadly, what I found out is that since 2009 there has been an attempt to ban this supplement or the FDA has become successful in banning this product (only see one supplier).

I know we don't want to believe that this is about profit and control, but I am finding it hard to understand why the FDA would want to ban Pyridoxamine, when the FDA knows that it has powerful health benefits (breaks down AGEs, prevents diabetic neuropathy, etc).  Reason...a drug company wanted to patent it and...because they realized it was a supplement being sold for less in stores, they had to devise a way to change that....

Currently LEF is the only company I've been able to find online that is selling this (through various retailers), until their supply runs out, and below is their write up about this:

FDA Seeks to Ban Pyridoxamine (July 2009)
(Stores are carrying the coenzymated form of B6, P5P, which has similar benefits)


Shame on You, FDA: Pyridoxamine and Health Freedom… and Truth!
(The above article also covers foods that have been under attack by the FDA)


All the best,

SJ

In Topic: Milk causing cystic acne

06 March 2010 - 03:15 PM

To this day, and I started avoiding dairy products over 7 years ago, I will still breakout if I consume a dairy product. I try not to do so, but sometimes when eating out you may still get caught (e.g. Tandori chicken..yummy but still marinated in yogurt, buttery flavoring...may have a milk protein, etc.).

That said 99% of the time I will have a mucous reaction (i.e. evidenced by throat clearing) within minutes of consuming something with dairy in it so I usually know when it has happened, even if the meal did not taste or look like it would have any. The **fun** result of all of this is that get a very specific type of cystic acne (1 - 3 cysts from just mild exposure) about 5 days later. It can be quite persistant lasting 2 - 3 weeks each time I am exposed to dairy products.

It does not matter if it is Regular Milk or Organic Milk (tosses the extra hormones only theory out),  Yogurt, Cheese, Butter, Rice Cheese (has casein) or Whey Protein Isolate (Whey is another rmilk protein)....I will break out.  So...I do my best to avoid as it is never ever worth it!  eusa_naughty.gif

My milk alternatives for drinking on occasion, cereal, cooking or baking are as follows:

  • So Delicious Unsweetened Coconut Milk (cereal, baking, homemade ice cream)
  • Canned Coconut Milk (baking)
  • Pacific Unsweetened Oat Milk (sometimes for baking)
  • West Soy Unsweetened Enriched Plain Rice Milk (less gritty than Rice Dream, many purposes)
  • Rice Dream Unsweetened (Enriched) Rice Milk ....Original, Carob, Chocolate (many purposes)
  • Unsweetened Hemp Milk (baking)
  • Unsweetened Soy Milk (sometimes for baking)

HTH

SJ

In Topic: Virastop by Enzymedica

03 March 2010 - 11:23 AM

QUOTE (Quanta2998 @ Mar 2 2010, 07:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
When do you suggest taking QBC?

I normally take virastop morning and night before I eat/go to sleep. Would it make sense to add QBC in the morning? Is there a recommended QBC you prefer?



Hi Quanta,

I do not have a preference. I would go with the one that gives you the most Quercetin and Bromelian (with highest amt of GDUs) in the formulation (also pay attention to serving amount: 1 capsule, 2 capsules, etc.). Some products will show only quercetin on the bottle, but when you look at the back you will see that it also has the bromelian and vitamin C, so make sure you look at all possible products. While Vitamin C is helpful, it's the other two incredients you want to focus on the most. You may want to try one of the following since they fit the bill: Super Quercetin by Bluebonnet or Quercetin with Bromelain by Now.

As for when you take it, you can follow what is says on the bottle. I don't think that it would be a problem with taking it at the same time as you do your Virastop, but you will have to experiment with that. If you want to learn more about these inflammation regulating nutrients, you can read this bit of info here: http://www.immunesup...om/92fal004.htm

Best of luck!