I had discussion with a cpl of doctors in the UK for ReCell combined with an invasive treatment. I am planning to travel to the UK in the coming months and shall decide accordingly.
One suggested Dermabrasion and recell (Dr. Maini) , while the second fraxel, subcision and recell (Dr. Khan). Dr. Khan's view is since recell was intended for burn victims, the skin needs to be burnt off using laser, and his work can be seen in ernestoria's thread http://www.acne.org/...ll/?hl=ernesto.
I should mention i have brown skin tone (indian) and my scars are almost like Ernesto's.
A lot of texture issues along with bigger pores and wider ice picks have been documented by individuals who have gone through Dermabrasion alone. Will recell be able to negate all those complications.
Also, which holds more promise on their own (i-e without recell) Dermabrasion or Fraxel Repair?
I would like some intelligent feedback from the members regarding which option they think is better and why.