#21
Posted 09 April 2009 - 12:48 PM
#22
Posted 01 October 2009 - 02:04 AM
I'm a bit disappointed that they are not releasing the pill form but a topical, but then this is an existing drug being used for some other purposes so I thought they must have trouble with the patent since some other company must have already owned it...
Now if only we can find out which drug we're talking about....
#23
Posted 23 October 2009 - 10:31 PM
Unfortunately I doubt the pharma industry will find a cure for such a common condition that gives them a bunch of money....
probably the topical will be just weak for helping people with mild cases...
just like the other new drugs on the market...
solodyn
doryx
oracea...
all have a common antibiotic but they sell them as if they were discoveries just because of their extended release....
#24
Posted 07 November 2009 - 05:15 PM
#25
Posted 12 February 2010 - 09:08 AM
#26
Posted 13 February 2010 - 09:49 PM
#27
Posted 28 February 2010 - 05:44 AM
#28
Posted 28 February 2010 - 12:08 PM
#29
Posted 01 March 2010 - 12:06 PM
There's an interesting wiki page about the product here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMT_D002
Still looks like a couple of years wait until we can get out hands on it though.
#30
Posted 06 March 2010 - 09:51 PM
But they release it as a placebo; as a topical, completely inefficient or much less so than in pill form. People will buy it, use it for months, give up on it, some will say it worked, others not, and it will continue to enjoy its reputation of being an acne cure anyway and the company will make a lot of cash, like so many other products out there that don't work.
Edited by Chocobot, 06 March 2010 - 09:52 PM.
#31
Posted 07 March 2010 - 06:11 AM
They won't be releasing a placebo.
Maybe, in pill form, there are a number of side effects. In topical form, perhaps they won't be as severe.
#32
Posted 07 March 2010 - 12:55 PM
They won't be releasing a placebo.
Maybe, in pill form, there are a number of side effects. In topical form, perhaps they won't be as severe.
Wrong, it was said that the side effects were very minimal, especially compared to other solutions like Accutane. A topical can never be a solution to prevent or treat acne seriously, never has been. You must lower sebum production and that is not going to happen with a product that you put on the skin. On top of that, their tests were made with a pill, not a topical solution.
#33
Posted 24 February 2011 - 08:21 PM
#34
Posted 17 April 2011 - 11:07 PM
Edited by smik, 17 April 2011 - 11:09 PM.
#35
Posted 11 October 2011 - 01:37 PM
Does anyone know when SMT D002 will be available in Canada if it hasn't already hit the market?
As of June 2010 it was reported that they decided to stop investing in developing a topical version of the drug
This sounds fishy considering that it would be a huge hit among those struggling with acne and undoubtedly a profitable venture.
What's the status on SMT D002. Can I volunteer to be a "guinea pig" ?
I'll gladly trade the flushing and sun sensitivity of Minocycline and try SMT D002
#36
Posted 11 October 2011 - 01:58 PM
#37
Posted 31 October 2011 - 07:18 PM
#38
Posted 01 November 2011 - 02:58 PM
Why do you think? Given that a safe, effective treatment would be worth hundreds of millions to a business I'll leave you to put two and two together...so basically......they gave up on this...why???!!!
#39
Posted 13 November 2011 - 10:23 AM
But no acne means no money from OTC products.
#40
Posted 13 November 2011 - 07:25 PM
thats so frustrating. it sucks how the world is run like that. its really cruel.Indeed. They already have drugs that could get rid of acne in most people [be it cathelicidin bf, sanofi vaccine, or countless very potent topicals]. They also can explain acne on the genomic level.
But no acne means no money from OTC products.
i mean personally i would pay a few thousand, 1-20k not even kidding if it meant no acne for the rest of my life. I dont even have that kind of money but i'd rather be in debt or stuck paying it off. some people get plastic surgery for that cost. im sure millions of people would pay up to at least 1-2k considering how much we all constantly pay for products, it all adds up to a few thousand over the years anyway. its so unfair.
they say acne vaccines are being worked on, but does anyone really think thats true?
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: drug summit, clinical
Acne and its treatments →
Prescription acne medications →
No Clinical Support For Myth That Accutane Delays Wound Healing And Increases Risk Of ScarringStarted by LeereWorte, 09 Feb 2013 |
|
|
||
Acne and its treatments →
Scar / red mark treatments →
Acne Scar Clinical TrialStarted by Binga, 07 Jan 2013 |
|
|
||
Acne and its treatments →
General acne discussion →
Is It A Good Idea To Participate In A Clinical Trial?Started by paigems, 17 Dec 2012 |
|
|
||
Acne and its treatments →
Scar / red mark treatments →
Clinical Trial Recruting For Subcision & Suction @ Northwestern UniStarted by *Inspired*, 22 Oct 2012 |
|
|
||
Acne Specifics →
Oily skin →
Oily Skin Clinical Trial - Here's Your Chance If You Live In Usa!Started by jsmithson, 08 Sep 2012 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






Home




