Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ACNE is not associated with P.acnes?

4 posts in this topic

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1871623...Pubmed_RVDocSum

Acne is not associated with yet-uncultured bacteria.

Bek-Thomsen M, Lomholt HB, Kilian M.

Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, The Bartholin Building, Wilhelm Meyer's Allé 1240, Aarhus University, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark.

Current clinical and microbiological information on acne fails to demonstrate a clear association between particular species, including Propionibacterium acnes, and disease, and the disease continues to be a considerable problem. To test if acne is associated with hitherto uncultured bacteria residing in diseased skin follicles, sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of approximately 5,700 amplified and cloned 16S rRNA genes were used to determine the microbial diversity in follicles from acne patients and healthy individuals and from the superficial skin of acne patients. Follicles from healthy skin were exclusively colonized by P. acnes, whereas the follicular microbiota of acne patients included, in addition, Staphylococcus epidermidis and minor proportions of other species. In comparison, samples from superficial skin showed a complex microbiota represented by 12 to 16 bacterial species. The findings of the study exclude the possibility that acne is associated with yet-uncultured bacteria and shows that healthy skin follicles constitute a remarkably exclusive habitat allowing colonization only by P. acnes.


Did the tane.

Breaking out quite badly again.

Doing nothing. Just letting nature take its course.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why didnt anyone reply on this?


I dont agree with what I posted in the nutrition section anymore. I just think its not worth it. People worrying about food and acne all day in order to improve their life somehow while they are actually just digging a bigger hole for themselfs. The only reason to eat right should be to feel a bit better. Because the chances you will be able to reduce your acne in such an amount that its worth the effort instead of just trying a new topical is astronomicly low.

Basically get a low effort topical like differin or something more harsh if that doesnt work and just start living the life you want to live!

Retired!


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why didnt anyone reply on this?

Morning Regimen:

Dan's Cleanser

Wait 2 minutes

Dan's BP

Wait 20+ minutes

Lac Hydrin 5 moisturizer + 100% jojoba oil

EltaMD 45 sunscreen (no oil- i got this from a dermatologist, expensive but worth it and lasts forever)

Nightly Regimen:

Dan's Cleanser

Wait 2 minutes

Dan's BP

Wait 20+ minutes

Dan's AHA + 100% jojoba oil + Lac Hydrin 5

Started Dan's Regimen January 1st, 2010. Used to get huge, often painful, nodular acne that lasted months, whiteheads, and some blackheads. Plus had scarring from old breakouts. 100% clear, scarring is less, and complexion is radiant :)


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They concluded it is NOT previously uncultured bacteria that's contributing to the break outs, since the extreme minority populations of as-yet-uncultured bacteria (which you can see in their curve), while highly diverse, are not large enough to be likely causing any problems. So there's a massive diversity of bacteria on the upper surface of the skin on everyone. Some of it has never been identified in studies of acne. There are lots of different ones present, but the mystery bacteria are not plentiful enough to be the cause. They did not isolate all of them.

***But inside healthy pores, P.acne has a monopoly. Not so with "acne" pores.

P.acne bacteria seem then to have the exclusive symbiotic relationship with healthy human pores. In healthy pores, we should expect only P.acne to be there. In "acne prone individuals" (the first word there might turn out to be a misnomer), for whatever reason Staphylococcus epidermidis, which is usually present elsewhere around the pores, is getting in there. This does not appear to be the result of contamination during extraction.

Now... Is it just because the pre-existing inflammation is allowing Staph to move in? Or is the Staph what's causing the inflammation? Or is Staph and P.acne somehow working together (and/or with something else contributing [me: like allergies or known environmental inflammatory contaminants, maybe?]) to perpetuate this inflammation, change in the bacterial population of the pore, and thus continue the status-quo of the infected & inflamed pore?

This is very significant what they found, regardless of the sample size in terms of people. The amount of skin samples extracted was quite large. No prior studies have ever been conducted that had the necessary fidelity to rule out contamination of the samples extracted from inside the pores with bacteria around them. They did something new, better, and got totally unprecedented results. I hope someone follows up on it with a repeat.


Low dose oral antibiotics for the long-term. Hibiclens morning and night in the shower. Occassional max strength triple-antibiotic white petroleum jelly all over the face (rarely, now). And occassionally salicylic acid wipes prep followed by 10% benzoyl peroxide PanOxyl (deactivates the Hibiclens, though). If you can afford oral or topical retinoids, you should try them.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites