breast implants
#1
Posted 22 July 2007 - 09:21 PM
#2
Posted 22 July 2007 - 09:23 PM
#3
Posted 22 July 2007 - 09:25 PM
#4
Posted 22 July 2007 - 09:30 PM
#5
Posted 22 July 2007 - 11:56 PM
#6
Posted 23 July 2007 - 12:01 AM
I wish I was 125 pounds. Want my 36Cs and I will be 125 pounds
#8
Posted 23 July 2007 - 12:18 AM
#9
Posted 23 July 2007 - 12:23 AM
I read that one can breastfeed with implants, provided it is under the muscle. Areolar insertion comes with more risks for nerve damage in the ductal area, and possible risk of damaging the ducts themselves. There are other means of insertion, too (like armpit!), but those require a longer area of tunneling to reach the final resting place for the implant.
Submuscular looks more natural, too, than above the muscle, and has less risk for capsular contracture, rupture, etc. It hurts one whole heck of a lot more because the muscle gets cut as well, and then there's a lot of handling of the tissue to create the pocket the implants are put in. It hurt like mad!
#10
Posted 23 July 2007 - 12:39 AM
#11
Posted 23 July 2007 - 12:46 AM
Are you guys at risk for having them rupture? I heard they don't last very long. They're safe(er?), now, right?
Sorry; I ask too many questions. xP
Are you still sore, Connie? I hear they really don't look their best until a few months down the road, so if you're pleased with them now, you're probably going to love them later.
#13
Posted 23 July 2007 - 01:14 AM
Are you guys at risk for having them rupture? I heard they don't last very long. They're safe(er?), now, right?
Sorry; I ask too many questions. xP
Are you still sore, Connie? I hear they really don't look their best until a few months down the road, so if you're pleased with them now, you're probably going to love them later.
The doctor told me that in 7 years only %10 of patients implants rupture. That's not to bad at all. The saline ones are safer cuz if it breaks then salt water goes in your body and not silicone. And saline is way less expensive too by like $2000!
#14
Posted 23 July 2007 - 01:18 AM
Were yours under the muscle or over? Where's the incision? If under the muscle, you're ONE tough cookie to already be thrilled.
#15
Posted 23 July 2007 - 01:22 AM
#16
Posted 23 July 2007 - 01:38 AM
#18
Posted 23 July 2007 - 01:56 AM
#19
Posted 23 July 2007 - 07:36 AM
I don't doubt that a bit. It makes a difference when one is used to smaller tissue there. It is suddenly very feminine and one feels wonderful. At least that was my experience. Did she seem self-confident?
#20
Posted 23 July 2007 - 08:10 AM
I had a breast lift after I finished breastfeeding my second child .... really didn't care for the deflated balloon look.
I was a C cup to begin with, so I was very emphatic with my surgeon about not getting any bigger than that. I have broad shoulders and pretty muscular arms, and I think larger breasts would have made me excessively top-heavy.
Anyway, I'm thrilled with my results ..... my breasts look and feel extremely natural, and the scars from the lift have faded really well.
I totally support women who want to augment their breasts for personal reasons, but I do advise anyone considering the process to think long and hard about how big they want to go. My sister-in-law, who has a very similar build to mine -- tall, athletic, broad-shouldered -- went for a large D-cup. Big mistake, IMO ..... she used to look really elegant in her clothes, and now she's just all boobs.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






Home




