I put some retin-a micro only on my redmarks last week for only a few days, and the skin around the marks got red and irritated, but then peeled a few days after. i then used a lactic peel to take care of the rest of the dead skin. redmarks faded alot faster than using just a glycolic peel. skin isnt red and irritated anymore. maybe retin-a is better than doing a peel? not sure.
hmm...my redmarks faded real well
Started by aznboi986, Sep 11 2005 10:22 PM
2 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 11 September 2005 - 10:22 PM
#2
Posted 12 September 2005 - 02:11 AM
QUOTE(aznboi986 @ Sep 12 2005, 04:22 AM)
I put some retin-a micro only on my redmarks last week for only a few days, and the skin around the marks got red and irritated, but then peeled a few days after. i then used a lactic peel to take care of the rest of the dead skin. redmarks faded alot faster than using just a glycolic peel. skin isnt red and irritated anymore. maybe retin-a is better than doing a peel? not sure.
i found a bottle of retin-a in my draw last week, i think its from about 2-3 years ago. it goes of in nov this year. maybe i should try it?!?
#3
Posted 12 September 2005 - 06:00 AM
QUOTE(headturner4 @ Sep 12 2005, 12:11 AM)
QUOTE(aznboi986 @ Sep 12 2005, 04:22 AM)
I put some retin-a micro only on my redmarks last week for only a few days, and the skin around the marks got red and irritated, but then peeled a few days after. i then used a lactic peel to take care of the rest of the dead skin. redmarks faded alot faster than using just a glycolic peel. skin isnt red and irritated anymore. maybe retin-a is better than doing a peel? not sure.
i found a bottle of retin-a in my draw last week, i think its from about 2-3 years ago. it goes of in nov this year. maybe i should try it?!?
no it didnt break me out. was on accutane.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Home












