My Fraxel (Restore) Results - 1 year later.
#1
Posted 28 July 2008 - 06:43 PM
#2
Posted 29 July 2008 - 12:31 AM
#3
Posted 22 August 2008 - 01:14 AM
I remember that they were towards the higher side, but I'm not sure, sorry.
#4
Posted 22 August 2008 - 09:44 AM
#5
Posted 22 August 2008 - 11:42 AM
Hey, I've been reading through the forum a lot and finally joined. Okay...silversunpickup... I feel your pain. I just finished my 5th continuous totaling 8 all together treatment of fraxel. Right now my feeling is exactly same as yours.
"The couple of days afterwards you look great because your face is swollen, so everything looks evened out. But, within a week my skin always returned to its original condition."
Due to the swallowing your scars plump up and makes it appears your skin is evened out yet after 2 week or so depressed area still exists.
Yet, I am not about to throw the towel. I am going to see it improved!! I am starting a thread journal of my acne scar journey. Just need to find out how first. : ) Don't forget to visit me and share your journey as well!!
#6
Posted 22 August 2008 - 06:01 PM
#7
Posted 22 August 2008 - 07:23 PM
*About the settings, again I'm not sure, I always just asked her to go as powerful as possible.
#8
Posted 23 August 2008 - 01:04 PM
#9
Posted 23 August 2008 - 01:50 PM
I totally agree with you!!!!!!!
I spend $$$$$ for a newest Fraxel(fractional laser) treatment( it supposes to have a less downtime and much better results) last year. Each treatment cost me $1200.
I did 6 course, because the doctor recommended to me. He is very well known as an expert of laser, and on TV/magazine a lot. He also teaches at a famous university.
He promised me that I'll see a 40%-70% improvement, and also he was very positive.
So I trusted him... but it has been 7 months already, and my skin has not improved at all!!!!!!!!!!!
I am so regret that I spend a lot if money on it.
All doctors just want to make money!!!
I got much better results from a chemical peel treatment...
I want my money back..!
PS. My scars are very very minor, but still it didn't work..!!!!!!
#10
Posted 23 August 2008 - 09:00 PM
myskin: What type of peel worked for you?
#11
Posted 23 August 2008 - 09:23 PM
If you had deeper rollling scars you might want to try subscision.
#12
Posted 17 March 2009 - 05:06 PM
#13
Posted 27 March 2009 - 04:08 PM
I totally agree with you!!!!!!!
I spend $$$$$ for a newest Fraxel(fractional laser) treatment( it supposes to have a less downtime and much better results) last year. Each treatment cost me $1200.
I did 6 course, because the doctor recommended to me. He is very well known as an expert of laser, and on TV/magazine a lot. He also teaches at a famous university.
He promised me that I'll see a 40%-70% improvement, and also he was very positive.
So I trusted him... but it has been 7 months already, and my skin has not improved at all!!!!!!!!!!!
I am so regret that I spend a lot if money on it.
All doctors just want to make money!!!
I got much better results from a chemical peel treatment...
I want my money back..!
PS. My scars are very very minor, but still it didn't work..!!!!!!
HEY UMM CAN U TELL ME WHAT DOCTOR TOLD U THAT??? WHAT WAS HIS NAME AND IF HE LIVE IN NEW YORK ...CAUSE I'M ABOUT TO GET THE FRAXEL 3/RESTORE IN A WEEK AND MY DOCTOR TOLD ME THOSE SAME WORDS AND HE;S ALSO FAMOUS WITH THE LASER....SO0O PLEASE LET ME KNOW BERORE I WASTE MY MONEY ON THIS GUY....
#14
Posted 27 March 2009 - 05:06 PM
Greg, subcision is one of the most effective ways to treat rolling scars. As with any procedure, there are risks. There are risks of new scarring and hyperpigmentation with lasers as well. Rolling scars are held down by tethers of scars tissue. It only makes sense to break those tethers to release the top layer of skin and level it. It's all in the technique. If you get a doctor who doesn't have much experience with subcision, there are risks of new scarring, however, if you get a doctor who knows what he/she is doing, subcision is one of the most physically effective and cost-effective procedures for rolling scars. I'm getting it done next week.
#15
Posted 27 March 2009 - 06:56 PM
Greg, subcision is one of the most effective ways to treat rolling scars. As with any procedure, there are risks. There are risks of new scarring and hyperpigmentation with lasers as well. Rolling scars are held down by tethers of scars tissue. It only makes sense to break those tethers to release the top layer of skin and level it. It's all in the technique. If you get a doctor who doesn't have much experience with subcision, there are risks of new scarring, however, if you get a doctor who knows what he/she is doing, subcision is one of the most physically effective and cost-effective procedures for rolling scars. I'm getting it done next week.
I am going back for my second round of subcision on May 8, 2009. I agree with Saleena that you have to go the base of the problem for rolling acne scars: the tethered fibrous bands that hold down the tissue.
Of all of the acne scarring methods I've read, this one comes with the fewest risks, is probably the least expensive, and goes directly to the source of the problem.
Best wishes on your journey to healing....
#16
Posted 11 May 2010 - 06:34 PM
Facts: when you undergo treatments... ( esp... prolonged ones)
1. you are more likely to see less improvement with time.... ( just like weight loss and weight gain)...
the initial improvement ( usually after a couple of treaments) is the most dramatic... only because to look at yourself in the mirror too often!
2. If you are expecting skin to be back as it was before the acne marched in... you are definitely in for a disappointment...
- scarred faces could only improve to a certain extent but never to get to even and smoothas it was before... though repetitive regimens to peel/stimulate collagen/resurface will camouflage the marks... buuuuutttt......... still.... at closer look... you still have marks......
3. laser resurfacing is to collagen synthesis... peelers is to skin turnover (s. basalis stimulation).. subsicion is to detachment of scar underneath (pustuled acnes, big red pimples in the past)... fillers for volume restoration.....
your treatment should be costumized/ personalized... helps a lot to specify what you want to improve and your expectations... helps the doctor that way...
4. Dermaroller is to collagen synthesis... a cheaper alternative to laser and been proven to be equivocal ( if not superior) with lasers ONLY in scar resurfacing/acne marks...
- its a bitmore painful though...
5. helps to have a mild peeling regimen daily (not for the sensitive ones)... this works slowly in improving your skin without you sweating it out...
Hope this helps!
#17
Posted 12 May 2010 - 02:08 PM
#19
Posted 12 May 2010 - 05:24 PM
Added photo
i have no clue why there are even posts on this. fraxel restore is an incredibly weak laser with little potential to improve scars to any degree. the majority of people on this site do not recommend it. if you want to see the results you are after, you will need to try fraxel repair or another stronger laser treatment. sorry if it sounds negative. its just wasting peoples time by positing it on here.
#20
Posted 12 May 2010 - 07:57 PM
If it's so weak why do the company reccommend it for acne scarring?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



Home












