TYPE 1 DIABETES
#1
Posted 01 March 2008 - 09:21 AM
YES, AFTER 6 WEEKS ON ACCUTANE SHE HAD NO ACTIVE BREAKOUTS, HAD SEVERE SCARRING, BUT NOW MUST BE ON INSULIN FOR THE REST OF HER LIFE!!
THIS DRUG MUST BE BANNED! IT IS INSANE! WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD RISK THEIR HEALTH AND THEIR LIFE? PLEASE, PLEASE PLEASE RESEARCH BEFORE YOU MAKE A DECISION THAT MAY AFFECT THE REST OF YOUR LIFE OR YOUR LIFE ITSELF.
#2
Posted 01 March 2008 - 09:26 AM
however, every person perceives the drug differently because it has a different effect onevery person, and therefore i do not think that they should ban it.
every drug has some type of extremely bad side effects/ outcomes. but the number that these awful side effects happen on is very minimal. even retalin, which helps children concentrate can be addictive and even kill, but should they ban it? no.
maybe your daughter ate too much food that contained sugar, and that mixed with accutane created this diagnoses, i have no idea.
#3
Posted 01 March 2008 - 10:08 AM
however, every person perceives the drug differently because it has a different effect onevery person, and therefore i do not think that they should ban it.
every drug has some type of extremely bad side effects/ outcomes. but the number that these awful side effects happen on is very minimal. even retalin, which helps children concentrate can be addictive and even kill, but should they ban it? no.
maybe your daughter ate too much food that contained sugar, and that mixed with accutane created this diagnoses, i have no idea.
I HEAR YOU BUT EATING TOO MUCH SUGAR DOES NOT CAUSE TYPE 1 DIABETES, IT IS THE DESTRUCTION OF THE PANCREAS' INSULIN MAKING CENTER THAT DOES. ALSO THE DR DID NOT TEST FOR SUGAR LEVELS BEFORE SHE WAS GIVEN THE DRUG. I AM IMPLORING ANYONE CONSIDERING THIS DRUG TO MAKE SURE THEIR SUGAR LEVELS ARE TESTED SO YOU DO NOT HAVE TO GO THROUGH WHAT MY DAUGHTER IS AND WILL FOR THE REST OF HER LIFE. IT IS A LISTED SIDE EFFECT. (HAVING SUGAR LEVEL PROBLEMS). SINCE THIS DRUG WAS INTRODUCED 20 YEARS ADO THE FDA HAS REQUIRED THEM TO KEEP RELABELING THE SIDE EFFECTS AS MORE AND MORE ARE ATTRIBUTED TO ACCUTANE. IT IS ONE OF ONLY 3 DRUGS THAT REQUIRES THE SPECIAL MED SHEET AND THAT ALL USERS NEED TO BE REGISTERED WITH THE FDA. IF THAT DOES NOT SCARE PEOPLE AWAY THEN GOOD LUCK TO THEM.
#4
Posted 01 March 2008 - 06:29 PM
#5
Posted 01 March 2008 - 06:30 PM
#6
Posted 01 March 2008 - 06:46 PM
Try to take some comfort in that you didn't make a horrible mistake. You were doing the best you could in a tough situation to begin with.... Ongoing heavy acne can be as debilitating as any disease...
#7
Posted 01 March 2008 - 08:22 PM
YES, AFTER 6 WEEKS ON ACCUTANE SHE HAD NO ACTIVE BREAKOUTS, HAD SEVERE SCARRING, BUT NOW MUST BE ON INSULIN FOR THE REST OF HER LIFE!!
THIS DRUG MUST BE BANNED! IT IS INSANE! WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD RISK THEIR HEALTH AND THEIR LIFE? PLEASE, PLEASE PLEASE RESEARCH BEFORE YOU MAKE A DECISION THAT MAY AFFECT THE REST OF YOUR LIFE OR YOUR LIFE ITSELF.
it sounds like your the one who should have done the research ? and nobody forced your daughter to take accutane. this is why they give you a booklet of information about it so your aware of the risks of the drug.
anyways this story sounds like bs to me. u blame 1 month of accutane alone for destroying your daughters pancreas. and coming on here with the name "mom of an accutane wreck" and ranting about it. probably some guy who is mad accutane gave him flushing so he makes up stories to scare people away from it
#8
Posted 02 March 2008 - 06:44 AM
YES, AFTER 6 WEEKS ON ACCUTANE SHE HAD NO ACTIVE BREAKOUTS, HAD SEVERE SCARRING, BUT NOW MUST BE ON INSULIN FOR THE REST OF HER LIFE!!
THIS DRUG MUST BE BANNED! IT IS INSANE! WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD RISK THEIR HEALTH AND THEIR LIFE? PLEASE, PLEASE PLEASE RESEARCH BEFORE YOU MAKE A DECISION THAT MAY AFFECT THE REST OF YOUR LIFE OR YOUR LIFE ITSELF.
it sounds like your the one who should have done the research ? and nobody forced your daughter to take accutane. this is why they give you a booklet of information about it so your aware of the risks of the drug.
anyways this story sounds like bs to me. u blame 1 month of accutane alone for destroying your daughters pancreas. and coming on here with the name "mom of an accutane wreck" and ranting about it. probably some guy who is mad accutane gave him flushing so he makes up stories to scare people away from it
I CANNOT PROVE WHO I AM, BUT WHY WOULD ANYONE WASTE THEIR TIME MAKING UP STORIES? LIFE IS WAY TOO SHORT. OF COURSE THERE ARE JERKS WHO PROBABLY HAVE NOTHING BETTER TO DO. YES I SHOULD HAVE DONE RESEARCH BUT MY EX INSISTED THAT SHE BE PUT ON THIS DRUG, SHORT OF HIRING A LAWYER WHICH I COULD NOT AFFORD, I COULD NOT STOP HIM. AFTER SHE WAS ON IT I DID DO RESEARCH SO I COULD BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR DEPRESSION AND SUICIDAL TENDENCIES THAT ARE DOCUMENTED BY ROCHE THEMSELVES. I READ ABOUT EVERY SIDE EFFECT INCLUDING "IT CAN AFFECT SUGAR LEVELS" IN ROCHES OWN LITERATURE. I ALSO VISITED THE FDA SITE AND WAS ASTOUNDED BY HOW MANY TIMES THEY HAVE REQUIRED ROCHE TO RELABEL AS A NEW DANGEROUS SIDE AFFECT WAS PROVEN TO BE LINKED TO ACCUTANE. GO TO THEIR SITE AND YOU WILL SEE THEM TOO. (FDA). MAYBE YOU ARE AN EMPLOYEE OF ROCHE PHARMACUETICALS SENT TO SPY ON THESE FORUMS TO MAKE SURE NOONE IS BASHING THEM, I AM JUST TRYING TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE WHO CHOOSE TO TAKE ACCUTANE DO THEIR RESEARCH FIRST AND GET EVERY BLOOD TEST THEY CAN INCLUDING GLUCOSE SINCE ACCUTANE AFFECTS GLUCOSE LEVELS.
#9
Posted 02 March 2008 - 10:16 AM
#10
Posted 02 March 2008 - 10:36 AM
#11
Posted 02 March 2008 - 12:17 PM
TYPE 1 DIABETES IS NOT GENETIC IT IS AN AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE. TYPE 2 DIABETES IS GENETIC. THEY ARE VERY SEPARATE DISEASES. I WILL STOP POSTING BECAUSE EVERYONE SEEMS TO WANT TO IGNORE ALL OF THE ACCUTANE AND MOST IMPORTANTLY THE FDA WARNINGS. GOOD LUCK TO ALL.
#12
Posted 02 March 2008 - 02:21 PM
TYPE 1 DIABETES IS NOT GENETIC IT IS AN AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE. TYPE 2 DIABETES IS GENETIC. THEY ARE VERY SEPARATE DISEASES. I WILL STOP POSTING BECAUSE EVERYONE SEEMS TO WANT TO IGNORE ALL OF THE ACCUTANE AND MOST IMPORTANTLY THE FDA WARNINGS. GOOD LUCK TO ALL.
Well, i have read and follow what you are saying, but at the end of the day... people are still going to take it?
I'm going on tuesday to see my derm, and want to be on 20mg for my course, culmulative or not, and see how things go... but it has cleared my skin up, people compliment me on it... which is something i thought would never happen having 15/20+ spots A DAY evetry day...
which is life hindering in itself, mental can be just as bad as physical.
#13
Posted 02 March 2008 - 02:59 PM
Seeing that she's taking accutane for acne, she must be at least 12+, genetic diabetes usually show up earlier than that...
#14
Posted 02 March 2008 - 03:02 PM
YES, AFTER 6 WEEKS ON ACCUTANE SHE HAD NO ACTIVE BREAKOUTS, HAD SEVERE SCARRING, BUT NOW MUST BE ON INSULIN FOR THE REST OF HER LIFE!!
THIS DRUG MUST BE BANNED! IT IS INSANE! WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD RISK THEIR HEALTH AND THEIR LIFE? PLEASE, PLEASE PLEASE RESEARCH BEFORE YOU MAKE A DECISION THAT MAY AFFECT THE REST OF YOUR LIFE OR YOUR LIFE ITSELF.
OMG! Thats scary! That is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too high of a blood sugar! I work in a nursing home and even before insulin is given to the residents, their blood sugar isnt anywhere above 300. Im sorry your daughter and your family is suffering from this stupid Accutane. I hate accutane too! It gave me suicidal ideations.
#15
Posted 02 March 2008 - 03:07 PM
YES, AFTER 6 WEEKS ON ACCUTANE SHE HAD NO ACTIVE BREAKOUTS, HAD SEVERE SCARRING, BUT NOW MUST BE ON INSULIN FOR THE REST OF HER LIFE!!
THIS DRUG MUST BE BANNED! IT IS INSANE! WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD RISK THEIR HEALTH AND THEIR LIFE? PLEASE, PLEASE PLEASE RESEARCH BEFORE YOU MAKE A DECISION THAT MAY AFFECT THE REST OF YOUR LIFE OR YOUR LIFE ITSELF.
it sounds like your the one who should have done the research ? and nobody forced your daughter to take accutane. this is why they give you a booklet of information about it so your aware of the risks of the drug.
anyways this story sounds like bs to me. u blame 1 month of accutane alone for destroying your daughters pancreas. and coming on here with the name "mom of an accutane wreck" and ranting about it. probably some guy who is mad accutane gave him flushing so he makes up stories to scare people away from it
I think the problem here is anyone who had success with Accutane gets so defensive when someone says they had a horrible reaction to it. The same also goes true though for people who have had the horrible side effects. I defend myself because of what the drug did to me and it appears thats what mom is a car wreck is doing too and understandably so
Seeing that she's taking accutane for acne, she must be at least 12+, genetic diabetes usually show up earlier than that...
Thats not true! Most people who get diabetes get it when they are older, not when they are in their teens
#16
Posted 02 March 2008 - 03:17 PM
TYPE 1 DIABETES IS NOT GENETIC IT IS AN AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE. TYPE 2 DIABETES IS GENETIC. THEY ARE VERY SEPARATE DISEASES. I WILL STOP POSTING BECAUSE EVERYONE SEEMS TO WANT TO IGNORE ALL OF THE ACCUTANE AND MOST IMPORTANTLY THE FDA WARNINGS. GOOD LUCK TO ALL.
Not everyone. I understand you
#17
Posted 02 March 2008 - 03:23 PM
#18
Posted 02 March 2008 - 03:36 PM
I have never in my three years of working in a nursing home and 24 years of life having a mother who is an RN and my father who is a paramedic of a sixteen year old just randomly having a blood sugar of 600! If that is a side affect of accutane, then maybe the accutane did cause it. This mother is obviously distraught. I do not think now is the time to say that accutane might not have caused it.
#19
Posted 02 March 2008 - 05:03 PM
There are risks involved in taking accutane, just like there are risks involved in crossing the street. My experience with accutane has been totally positive.
#20
Posted 02 March 2008 - 06:30 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Home











