Acne theory
#1
Posted 21 October 2007 - 01:47 PM
I dont understand how someone who has really clear skin, breaks out into severe acne for no reason.
back in the day there are no pictures of people who had severe acne or acne, they probably let their natural bodies produce oils themselves, with no medicine what so ever.
Before I had cystic acne, I tried this product on my face.. and started breaking out horribly... it lasted 9 years of acne.
Im clear now, just using water to wash my face... and maybe once every 2 weeks i use dove soap with moisturizer.
What do you think about this theory? Maybe the pharmaceutical products did this to our faces?
#2
Posted 21 October 2007 - 01:49 PM
#3
Posted 21 October 2007 - 01:54 PM
no, because before i started getting acne, when i was 18, i didn't even wash my face. so definitely products i was using didn't break me out, because i wasn't using any. acne is a hormonal, genetic thing.
but lots of old people have bad acne scarring.
#4
Posted 21 October 2007 - 08:04 PM
Putting a product on your face once wouldn't cause 9 years of acne. (Unless you constantly applied it for 9 years). The only kind of acne that can be caused by a previous single exposure to toxins is chloracne, and that's a very different condition that is caused by Dioxins. (And No, these modern acne "fixes" like clean & clear do not contain dioxins in an attempt by cosmetics companies to perpetuate acne and increase sales.)
The human body is not in some perfect state of balance all the time. Think about it - people get diabetes, or cancer, or other diseases. Yes, some of these conditions can be caused by external factors, but in other instances, the body just develops them for no known reason. Sometimes people have acne for the same reason people have bad eyesight. There's an explanation, but no control over the cause. It's the same thing with acne.
#5
Posted 27 October 2007 - 09:54 AM
It wouldn't surprise me if you stop washing your face and still break out, most people's systems are fouled up from all the garbage they ate throughout their lives. Acne has multiple causes that you need to address before you get rid of it. This coming from someone who cured their own acne when the so-called skin experts couldn't.
#6
Posted 27 October 2007 - 10:06 AM
yes, it is genetic.
no it wasn't
then why are there so many old people with bad acne scarring, but now you see almost no one with bad acne. also, what about way back when leprosy was a huge concern. not to mention progress in detecting and removing skin cancer, as well as cosmetic dermatology.
#7
Posted 27 October 2007 - 10:20 AM
As far as old people having acne scarring, I don't deny that there may be a small number of old people with acne scars though I haven't personally seen any myself. Most old people I see, including all my grandparents who had flawless skin even though I didn't, do not have acne scarring and never had acne. If acne is genetic then why am I the only one in my family that had it? There aren't even that many people alive today that were alive in the 19th century.
Never apply any product to your skin and don't pick, scratch or touch your skin and you'll be better off. Think of those oils as your skin's natural shield, it makes no sense to strip it off.
#8
Posted 27 October 2007 - 10:28 AM
what do you think i did before i had acne, just that. in high school i didn't even wash my face, i didn't start using products until i actually had acne. and if acne medication is useless and doesn't work, then how come i haven't had a single pimple in many months?
#9
Posted 27 October 2007 - 10:38 AM
#10
Posted 27 October 2007 - 10:40 AM
They're not useless and they do work; but they're not usually tackling the root cause of acne.
It makes no evolutionary sense that this disease exists, so it must be new in an evolutionary sense, and our genes haven't had a chance to adapt.
I think the root cause of acne is diet. There's something about the modern diet that triggers it.
I think it's something like too many carbs and not enough vitamin A, C, zinc, vitamin E- acne is the endpoint of many months of something wrong with your diet.
(In some people it's going to be genetic however.)
#11
Posted 27 October 2007 - 10:46 AM
#12
Posted 27 October 2007 - 10:48 AM
what do you think i did before i had acne, just that. in high school i didn't even wash my face, i didn't start using products until i actually had acne. and if acne medication is useless and doesn't work, then how come i haven't had a single pimple in many months?
This guys theory background is flawed from the get go. Actually a large number of people did have acne back in the old days. I guess you havent been in very many nursing homes. Or talk to very many older people. I volunteer part time at several nursing homes. I have talked to numerous older people that got acne and they would talk about all the treatments at the time for acne. Also with talking with allot of them. Every single one said that acne is just as much of a problem as it was then as it is today. Infact in some cases it was worst back then because their wasn't a whole lot out to treat it effectively like their is today. Why do you think their is so many ol wifes tales about acne as well as some kinda strange homeopathic ideas that have develop throughout the years. Boils and cyst and remedies have gone back to the Chinese some 2,000 years ago where medications and tricks where written to improve the condition of them.
#13
Posted 27 October 2007 - 10:56 AM
#14
Posted 27 October 2007 - 01:22 PM
i mean i just rinsed it with water in the shower, because it never got oily or anything. my dad had acne when he was my age, so i assume that i got it from him. although, his didn't get better until he outgrew it because they didn't have the treatments they do now.
a lack of "natural oils" isn't the cause of acne. it has to do with the shape of the follicle, which is genetically determined, and the way the dead cells shed from the follicle wall. as well as the amount of oil produced by the sebaceous glands, which can be effected by hormones. that's not to say that irritating products won't make acne worse, they will. but they are not the cause of acne.
#15
Posted 27 October 2007 - 04:28 PM
jordan, i really recommend you to read the clear skin diet by alan logan. you seem like an intelligent guy, but i want to tell ya, acne is not simply a result of genetics alone. It's the also the result of the modern lifestyle. Some people have genetics that are so good that they aren't touched even a bit by environmental stressors. But most of us--acne sufferers-are greatly affected by stress, diet, and lifestyle choices. please read the book, you'll be enlightened,
#16
Posted 27 October 2007 - 11:09 PM
#17
Posted 28 October 2007 - 06:13 AM
Just the other day, I heard someone commenting that if you look at pictures of teenagers from the 80s they usually have dreadful looking skin, whereas nowadays if you go out and look at teenage skin it's pretty much usually quite clear.
#18
Posted 28 October 2007 - 10:43 AM
#19
Posted 28 October 2007 - 11:04 AM
Not everything has to "make evolutionary sense" to be retained in our genetic makeup. Sometimes the genes for one trait are tied to the genes for another trait. For example, the gene for sickle cell anemia. In moderinzed countries there is no benefit to having the gene for this disease - it appears to make no "evolutionary sense". However, it has been discovered that the gene for sickle cell is linked to a gene that protects against malaria. Now, when people were living in climates where maleria was prevalent - having this gene was very beneficial to survival. Maleria is far more deadly than sickle cell is, so those with this protective gene against maleria were more likely to survive, even though they carried the gene for sickle cell (which by itself, seems to make no evoluationary sense in westernized countries where maleria isn't a problem).
Who knows what the gene for acne might be linked to. Also, there is pretty good evidence that the gene for cystic acne came from the Spainard population. There has been a long history of cystic acne in people from this region, and you can trace the development of cystic acne in populations that the Spainards conquered (Mexicans, American and Central American Indians). There was no evidence of cystic acne in these populations until they were taken over by the Spanish, (who interbred with these populations and passed on the cystic acne gene).
I think some people are arguing slightly different things in this thread. Acne has an underlying genetic cause, but other things (diet, skin care products) may possibly exacerbate it (but are not the original, underlying cause). On the flip side, there are skin care products and dietary changes that may help prevent and control acne, but it will not change the genetic tendency towards this disease.
#20
Posted 28 October 2007 - 11:16 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Home











