Jump to content

Internet alternatives to Expensive Clearlight treatments


129 replies to this topic

#81 blacksheiladog

    Member

  • Veteran Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 173
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Diego
  • Joined: 09-August 04

Posted 09 November 2007 - 10:13 PM

One could set the bulbs in front of one of those tanning reflector folding things that people place in front of them while lying in a lounge chair at the beach.... you know what i mean? That type of reflector is just basically foil on cardboard, but does help keep light all coming at you if one were to try the tubes in a bare configuration. It also has the advantage of getting more to the cheeks rather than just from straight ahead.

I still think the best way to go for maximum 415nm light is with the 24 inch fixture for fishtanks referenced in my first post, with a mirror behind it in the hood. That would do pretty well I think because with 2 x 65 watts (two actinic tubes), even if you wasted 50 percent of the light, you would still get a lot of bang with net of 65 actual useable fluor watts on the face from less than a foot away.

So far though, with all my investigation, I can't beat the ease of using the two ebay lights, which can be set on a bed side or on the floor, and direct light at the face from two sides at once. -Dan



QUOTE(Techguy @ Nov 5 2007, 10:06 PM) View Post
Screw-in ballasts do exist. The problem is that there are lots of different socket styles used by fluorescent tubes and finding a screw-in ballast for your particular tube may be a challenge.

An example of a screw-in ballast is shown here:
http://www.goodmart.com/products/74094.htm

I don't recall what bases are used on most of the PC Fluorescent actinic tubes, so I can't comment on whether the one above would match any of them.

Note, the tubes need support if they are much longer than about 6 inches.

Lastly, since acne treatment requires very high intensity light, it is really important not to waste any of it. This means that you want a well-shaped reflector redirecting all of the light from the tube onto your skin. That's hard to do without a fixture behind the bulb to hold the reflector in place. As long as you're going to have a fixture, you may as well use it to mount a separate ballast. I posted earlier a link to a site that sells low-cost kits for aquariums. They have everything you need, including the reflectors.

If you are determined to use a direct screw-in approach, then you would probably be better off with the EnLux reflector LED bulb, since it has an integral reflector. Its primary drawback is its price (~$120)


#82 mikeye

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 31
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Joined: 26-September 07

Posted 12 November 2007 - 12:00 PM

Just an update, I finally got my hands on 2 ebay acne lamps so that's 2 X 27W 420nm lamps. In total the wattage will be 54W. I've stopped using the aqualight which has 2 X 9W 420nm lamps (18W in total) since I didn't see improvements after about 6 weeks.

So I will try the 2 ebay lamps which has about 3 times the wattage of the aqualight and see if the increased wattage helps.

#83 blacksheiladog

    Member

  • Veteran Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 173
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Diego
  • Joined: 09-August 04

Posted 15 November 2007 - 09:07 AM

QUOTE(mikeye @ Nov 12 2007, 10:00 AM) View Post
Just an update, I finally got my hands on 2 ebay acne lamps so that's 2 X 27W 420nm lamps. In total the wattage will be 54W. I've stopped using the aqualight which has 2 X 9W 420nm lamps (18W in total) since I didn't see improvements after about 6 weeks.

So I will try the 2 ebay lamps which has about 3 times the wattage of the aqualight and see if the increased wattage helps.


I'll look forward to hearing your results. -Dan


#84 blacksheiladog

    Member

  • Veteran Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 173
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Diego
  • Joined: 09-August 04

Posted 19 November 2007 - 02:51 PM

bump

#85 s500

    Member

  • Veteran Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 297
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Joined: 12-July 05

Posted 21 November 2007 - 12:13 AM

I remember doing my first clearlight session 3 years ago, after the 3rd session I noticed clear skin and just great results. It was a 20 min session each friday. I was skeptical and wanted to do it daily, I never thought 20 minutes weekly could achieve anything but the machine was a miracle. I did this till week 6 and just got tired of driving so far to this Dr., 50 miles each way.

I started the same mission that this thread starter did, hunting for a bulb that produced 420nm, I was always scared of buying the fish tank 03 bulbs since you would need some type of filter that would allow the 420nm light in and filter everything else out. These filters were very expensive and hard to get.

I also considered buying the clearlight bulb, connecting it to a 400w transformer and ignitor and try powering things up, the bulb at the time was 400.00 usd. Which I think is still the best thing to do, this way you guarantee your getting the right light. Anyone experimented with the original bulb?

Big pharmaceutical companies should definetly market something like this so that we can go to the pharmacy and buy a small portable machine, and take that accutane off the market.


#86 s500

    Member

  • Veteran Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 297
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Joined: 12-July 05

Posted 21 November 2007 - 12:31 AM

Found the same link I was messing with years ago, the bulb is still the same price, however the machine dropped greatly in price on ebay, they used ot be 25,000 when they came out, now theyre 7,000, still alot.

Here is the link to the bulb and it looks like they have the filters too now. I would love to do a setup like this, using a 400w transformer and ignitor.

http://www.cosmeticlasercenter.net/Clearlight_Bulb.html

#87 blacksheiladog

    Member

  • Veteran Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 173
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Diego
  • Joined: 09-August 04

Posted 21 November 2007 - 12:19 PM

QUOTE(s500 @ Nov 20 2007, 10:31 PM) View Post
Found the same link I was messing with years ago, the bulb is still the same price, however the machine dropped greatly in price on ebay, they used ot be 25,000 when they came out, now theyre 7,000, still alot.

Here is the link to the bulb and it looks like they have the filters too now. I would love to do a setup like this, using a 400w transformer and ignitor.

http://www.cosmeticlasercenter.net/Clearlight_Bulb.html


Techguy tried to contact these folks that sell this "replacement" clearlight lamp, and I think they did not reply to his request for specifications. They also have a "shop light" type of fixture that apparently uses dichromic glass and a regular halogen bulb, and Techguy was not keen on this type of solution. s500, are you still experiencing active acne, and needing to try a blue light alternative? I ask this because I have two extra of the ebay light bulbs, which I was holding as spares, and need a person who could test them. It would involve buying two FML type desk lamps (Home Depot sells them for $19 each). If we could establish that the Ebay guy's lights are effective, I was going to try to negotiate a deal that would make these lights available to many more people who need help and want to avoid accutane, as you so correctly suggest. You can PM me if you want to also. I have done some checking and there are spectrums on the Actinic 03 lamps, and they do not seem to have any UV component and apparently are not requiring any filter. -Dan

#88 Techguy

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 28
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Joined: 28-September 07

Posted 26 November 2007 - 02:40 AM

Blackshieladog is correct about the spectrum of the Actinic 03 bulbs not requiring expensive filters. On the other hand, I'm pretty certain that the 400w Metal-Halide professional bulbs do need filters. There really isn't any large inherent benefit to the Metal Halide bulbs over fluorescent, it's just the technology chosen by one manufacturer.

The cosmeticlasercenter folks have not replied to my multiple emails asking for specs (and bringing to their attention the misleading claims on their quartz-halogen lights). While their "Clearlight replacement" metal-halide bulbs *may* or *may not* be the real thing, I personally would not buy from someone who appears happy to misrepresent cheap incandescent shop lights as something they are not.

My own research on what works has been stalled by the reluctance of my daughters to take enough time away from homework, etc to sit in front of the lights. Perhaps if I take the time to come up with a more comfortable setup I might have better "patient compliance" as the doctors refer to it.

#89 blacksheiladog

    Member

  • Veteran Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 173
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Diego
  • Joined: 09-August 04

Posted 26 November 2007 - 08:48 PM

QUOTE(Techguy @ Nov 26 2007, 12:40 AM) View Post
My own research on what works has been stalled by the reluctance of my daughters to take enough time away from homework, etc to sit in front of the lights. Perhaps if I take the time to come up with a more comfortable setup I might have better "patient compliance" as the doctors refer to it.



Wow, I know just how you feel. My daughter refuses to even unbox the Beautyskin device i bought for her. Since she is using the ebay light 2 lamp setup, which covers the blue light treatment, I bought 3 extra Beautyskin red lamps to make the whole thing work with 6 red just to see if it would help her collagen and pigmentation, but alas, she won't do it and I guess I can't blame her. It is not comfortable to sit in front of the beautyskin product, as others have said. I am about to ship it back unopened sad.gif

Techguy: Would either of your daughters want to test the two extra ebay FML bulbs I have in reserve? You would need to get two desk lamps that use the bulbs, which should be available in hardware stores, home depot, target etc. My daughter finds that using two lamps, in two fixtures, angled at her face from both sides, lying on a pillow on the floor for 15 min is not that bad. She listens to music while doing it. I have offered these lights to a few folks, but so far no one has responded. First come first served, I guess. Knowing your interest in this subject, and given how much easier this ebay setup is to use, I would really like to find out if they will work for others. I know Mikeye is testing two I sent him right now, and I am anxious to find out if they work for him. I haven't heard anything for a while. -Dan

#90 iceboi

    Veteran Member

  • Veteran Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 1,542
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Location:Canada
  • Joined: 05-January 05

Posted 26 November 2007 - 09:27 PM

So Are the 420nm Blue Lights from Ebay going well for anyone? I'm really wanting to try this and see if there's any results so hopefully I get a boost of more reviews before purchasing it. I'm currently using the Red Light from Lightstim and the results are outstanding. It does help in healing the breakout process but doesn't stop the breakouts in the process so Blue Light is my next alternative. I was going to get Enlux but shipping fees are way too much plus the custom fees i will get inccured so no on that....

#91 Techguy

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 28
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Joined: 28-September 07

Posted 27 November 2007 - 12:12 AM

Thanks - Possibly, but I had better check with the girls and get a committment to really try them first. I'll PM you with an answer as soon as I can.

QUOTE(blacksheiladog @ Nov 26 2007, 09:48 PM) View Post
QUOTE(Techguy @ Nov 26 2007, 12:40 AM) View Post
My own research on what works has been stalled by the reluctance of my daughters to take enough time away from homework, etc to sit in front of the lights. Perhaps if I take the time to come up with a more comfortable setup I might have better "patient compliance" as the doctors refer to it.



Wow, I know just how you feel. My daughter refuses to even unbox the Beautyskin device i bought for her. Since she is using the ebay light 2 lamp setup, which covers the blue light treatment, I bought 3 extra Beautyskin red lamps to make the whole thing work with 6 red just to see if it would help her collagen and pigmentation, but alas, she won't do it and I guess I can't blame her. It is not comfortable to sit in front of the beautyskin product, as others have said. I am about to ship it back unopened sad.gif

Techguy: Would either of your daughters want to test the two extra ebay FML bulbs I have in reserve? You would need to get two desk lamps that use the bulbs, which should be available in hardware stores, home depot, target etc. My daughter finds that using two lamps, in two fixtures, angled at her face from both sides, lying on a pillow on the floor for 15 min is not that bad. She listens to music while doing it. I have offered these lights to a few folks, but so far no one has responded. First come first served, I guess. Knowing your interest in this subject, and given how much easier this ebay setup is to use, I would really like to find out if they will work for others. I know Mikeye is testing two I sent him right now, and I am anxious to find out if they work for him. I haven't heard anything for a while. -Dan



#92 blacksheiladog

    Member

  • Veteran Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 173
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Diego
  • Joined: 09-August 04

Posted 27 November 2007 - 10:59 PM

QUOTE(iceboi @ Nov 26 2007, 07:27 PM) View Post
So Are the 420nm Blue Lights from Ebay going well for anyone? I'm really wanting to try this and see if there's any results so hopefully I get a boost of more reviews before purchasing it. I'm currently using the Red Light from Lightstim and the results are outstanding. It does help in healing the breakout process but doesn't stop the breakouts in the process so Blue Light is my next alternative. I was going to get Enlux but shipping fees are way too much plus the custom fees i will get inccured so no on that....



We do not have enough testing and data yet to really say. I believe they are working for my daughter. Another user on this forum is currently testing two lamps I sent him and may be we will hear back soon on how he is doing.

#93 iceboi

    Veteran Member

  • Veteran Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 1,542
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Location:Canada
  • Joined: 05-January 05

Posted 30 November 2007 - 02:29 PM

I'm pretty sure there is onther place where you can get the bulb alone and that is from the SciArt company that sells Enlux Bulbs. You may want to look into them!!

I have tried asking the seller if I can get the Bulb, but he/she only sells them if you buy the entire lamp itself from them and them only....

#94 blacksheiladog

    Member

  • Veteran Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 173
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Diego
  • Joined: 09-August 04

Posted 30 November 2007 - 11:27 PM

QUOTE(countdown2failure @ Nov 29 2007, 07:46 PM) View Post
Hi all,
I've been watching this thread for a couple days, finally decided to register. As long as we are talking about that 'particular' ebay seller with those lamps... I must say I'm kinda angry that he has recently raised the starting bid to $129.99 (plus shipping) and only listing one at a time, in addition to one at a "buy it now" price of $179.99 + $17.90 shipping. I have actually been watching those lamps of his for over three years now, never have brought myself to buy one. With the price the way it is now, I'm actually thinking that this other model on ebay would be a better purchase:

Verilux ClearWave Light Therapy Acne Treatment System

It has both the 415 nm blue lights, and the 660 nm red lights, and is $189.95 with free shipping "buy it now", so it ends up being less expensive than that 'particular' ebay sellers lamps if you were to do his "buy it now" option.



Hi. I got your PM and responded. As to the Clarity Skin Rejuvination Light by NatureBright, I investigated this and found that although the device "looks" like the Beautyskin device, the Naturebright bulbs are only 8 watts each (x 6 bulbs). THis is not mentioned in their website, but I wrote them and they emailed back with that information. The Beautyskin is 15 watts each (x 6 bulbs -= 90 watts). So it is significantly less powerful than the beautyskin device. The Verilux looks like the NatureBright product, but since they don't list the bulb power, can't say for sure.

Also, these devices have 3 red and 3 blue blubs, so the blue 415nm power is only 50% of the total, in the case of Verilux, only 3 x 8 watts, or 24 watts, for blue, and in the case of Beautyskin, 3 x 15 watts, or 45 watts for blue. THe real issue, in my opinion, is how easy the device is to use, and how well you can focus the necessary light (be it red or blue) on to the face. With a flat faced device like Verilux and Beautyskin, you need to sit in front of it, in a chair, for example, and then you would have to turn the head to get it on the cheeks, etc, which means you are getting full effect on either side of the face only half the time.

Using two desklights, like that of the ebay seller, although somewhat expensive, would get much better coverage 100% of the treatment time, and be easier to use because you can lie down, PROVIDED it works, which I am not ready to say at this point without further tests. It's not too much more money if you buy one of his lights, and then an extra bulb. We really need to test his product on more people. -Dan

#95 blacksheiladog

    Member

  • Veteran Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 173
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Diego
  • Joined: 09-August 04

Posted 03 December 2007 - 10:53 PM

QUOTE(countdown2failure @ Dec 3 2007, 03:36 PM) View Post
QUOTE(countdown2failure @ Nov 29 2007, 07:46 PM) View Post


I feel I should apologize to everyone and point out that the Solarex Lamp that I provided a link to is a total rip-off upon closer investigation. From that page it appears to be only 19.99, but when you try to order it you find out there are hidden "order processing" charges, the shipping is excessive, and the "mail in rebate" is given in the form of "store credit", making the lamp actually $30 even before all the ridiculous shipping and other charges.

So yeah, sorry to anyone that followed that link. I will not post any other links without properly investigating them.



No worries....You can also edit a prior post, so if you want to remove a reference or remove a link, or update info, you can do so. I do this all the time as I refine information! There is a edit button below posts you write. -Dan

#96 s500

    Member

  • Veteran Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 297
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Joined: 12-July 05

Posted 05 December 2007 - 04:16 AM

QUOTE(Techguy @ Nov 26 2007, 08:40 AM) View Post
Blackshieladog is correct about the spectrum of the Actinic 03 bulbs not requiring expensive filters. On the other hand, I'm pretty certain that the 400w Metal-Halide professional bulbs do need filters. There really isn't any large inherent benefit to the Metal Halide bulbs over fluorescent, it's just the technology chosen by one manufacturer.


I dont think we get true 420nm out of these fluorecent bulbs and if we do I dont think its at the same strength as the clearlight bulbs. Clearlight decided to use these metal halide bulbs for a reason regardless of their expense, these bulbs burn certain metals that produce that certain blue at a certain peek at 400 watts. I seen results from 3 sessions only 20 minutes a week. Thats very little therapy for satisfactory results, I was pretty clear. I wish some of these fluorecent bulbs do work for the sake of everyone including myself but im skeptical. As far as filters, even regular household bulbs have filtered glass. You dont want to just put any light on your face without filters, especially what were messing with. The fluorecent bulbs might already be filtered from harmful rays, I really dont know. Hoffman La Roche should test and produce this and let our insurance company pay for a portable machine to take home. This machine does work I dont understand why pharmaceutical companies arent jumping on this. Perhaps the insurance companies will not pay for light therapy and this deters big companies from producing such portable machine.

#97 countdown2failure

    Take four lefts.

  • Veteran Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 218
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:That thing what lies between CA and WA
  • Joined: 29-November 07

Posted 06 December 2007 - 05:48 PM

Well this marks the beginning of my test of the same ebay lamps that others in this thread are using. (here is a link to the lamp) We will call this "day one". I have set this up so that I lay on the floor, with one lamp on either side of my face, slightly angled for optimal coverage, with the bulbs about eight inches from my face. As advised, I went down to the local tanning shop and purchased a pair of those little goggles they wear. At this point I believe the tanning goggles are absolutely necessary, as the lights are deceptively bright, and seem to have a strange/undesired effect on the naked eye; at least thats what happened to me when I first looked at them. Anyway, I will be continuing use of a generic three-part benzoil peroxide system to help control breakouts, but of course I will not have any products on my face at the time of treatment. I will be laying under the lamps for a total of thirty minutes a day, fifteen in the morning, and fifteen at night. I will also continue to take a daily multi-vitamin and vitamin C supplement; I believe that concludes the list of controlled variables for the test wink.gif . I will be posting weekly updates describing the results at each interval. So I guess thats it, here we go, wish me luck!

#98 s500

    Member

  • Veteran Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 297
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Joined: 12-July 05

Posted 07 December 2007 - 02:32 AM

QUOTE(countdown2failure @ Dec 6 2007, 11:48 PM) View Post
Well this marks the beginning of my test of the same ebay lamps that others in this thread are using. (here is a link to the lamp) We will call this "day one". I have set this up so that I lay on the floor, with one lamp on either side of my face, slightly angled for optimal coverage, with the bulbs about eight inches from my face. As advised, I went down to the local tanning shop and purchased a pair of those little goggles they wear. At this point I believe the tanning goggles are absolutely necessary, as the lights are deceptively bright, and seem to have a strange/undesired effect on the naked eye; at least thats what happened to me when I first looked at them. Anyway, I will be continuing use of a generic three-part benzoil peroxide system to help control breakouts, but of course I will not have any products on my face at the time of treatment. I will be laying under the lamps for a total of thirty minutes a day, fifteen in the morning, and fifteen at night. I will also continue to take a daily multi-vitamin and vitamin C supplement; I believe that concludes the list of controlled variables for the test wink.gif . I will be posting weekly updates describing the results at each interval. So I guess thats it, here we go, wish me luck!


I clicked the ebay link and it brings you to a whole setup with real little specifics in the auction, I noticed the seller claims its a 130w and i can only find that high wattage in a dual lamp of 420 and 460nm. Can you tell us whats the make, wattage and model number of the bulbs your using, is it the sunpak? Thanks and keep us updated.

#99 blacksheiladog

    Member

  • Veteran Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 173
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Diego
  • Joined: 09-August 04

Posted 08 December 2007 - 12:38 PM

QUOTE(s500 @ Dec 7 2007, 12:32 AM) View Post
QUOTE(countdown2failure @ Dec 6 2007, 11:48 PM) View Post
Well this marks the beginning of my test of the same ebay lamps that others in this thread are using. (here is a link to the lamp) We will call this "day one". I have set this up so that I lay on the floor, with one lamp on either side of my face, slightly angled for optimal coverage, with the bulbs about eight inches from my face. As advised, I went down to the local tanning shop and purchased a pair of those little goggles they wear. At this point I believe the tanning goggles are absolutely necessary, as the lights are deceptively bright, and seem to have a strange/undesired effect on the naked eye; at least thats what happened to me when I first looked at them. Anyway, I will be continuing use of a generic three-part benzoil peroxide system to help control breakouts, but of course I will not have any products on my face at the time of treatment. I will be laying under the lamps for a total of thirty minutes a day, fifteen in the morning, and fifteen at night. I will also continue to take a daily multi-vitamin and vitamin C supplement; I believe that concludes the list of controlled variables for the test wink.gif . I will be posting weekly updates describing the results at each interval. So I guess thats it, here we go, wish me luck!


I clicked the ebay link and it brings you to a whole setup with real little specifics in the auction, I noticed the seller claims its a 130w and i can only find that high wattage in a dual lamp of 420 and 460nm. Can you tell us whats the make, wattage and model number of the bulbs your using, is it the sunpak? Thanks and keep us updated.



He is claiming 130 watts as the equivalent of what 27 watts fluor is equal to in a regular bulb. A 27 watt fluor produces about the same lumens as a 130 watt bulb, roughly speaking. His actual bulb is rated at 27 watts. It is a custom manufactured bulb which is not apparently available anywhere else I or Techguy have been able to find. The make is not on the bulb, and a closeup of the bulb is at the end of page 2 of this thread (I posted high res pictures of it, post #40) http://www.acne.org/messageboard/index.php...2034&st=20#

#100 grier94107

    New Member

  • Members
  • Posts & Likes
    Posts: 1
    Likes: 0
About Me
  • Joined: 08-December 07

Posted 08 December 2007 - 02:44 PM

I'm a product developer and engineer by training, and was a fellow acne sufferer - I'm much clearer now - Blue light has worked for me (I used an array of 420nm bulbs, optimizing power and placement), I've decided to develop a powerful home friendly blue light machine with performance comparable to machines you would find a doctors office, but at a fraction of the price. I know what's important to me in this product, but I'd like to hear back from others so I can develop a product with features that a most important to the the highest number of users. I hope to have the prototype complete in four months. I will use your input in my design...here is where I'd like feedback. Please answer as many questions below as you can, and if you do not know the answer, please take your best guess. This will really help me design a product that will satsify your needs, and you will see the results of your efforts on this forum in the form of a great new product in a few months. :
  1. What are the most important features to you in any acne fighting product?
  2. What would be the most important features to you in blue light home treatment?
  3. Where would you be most likely use the product (in a common area, bed, or other?)
  4. What percentage of the time would the product be used on your face versus other parts of your body?
  5. What other parts of your body would you use this product on?
  6. How many minutes per day, and days per week are you wiling to perform light treatment at home?
  7. How much power do you believe is necissary to match the power of machines like Omnilux and other equipment found in a physician's office?
  8. How much are you willing to pay for the one time purchase of a product that works, (versus a series of office or clinical treaments) with comparable peformance to machines like Omnilux and other equipment found in a physician's office?

Thanks,
Jeff

Please feel free to respond to this survey directly by mailing your responses to [removed]



QUOTE (blacksheiladog @ Sep 29 2007, 02:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I decided to post what was essentially a reply to a message from another member regarding my research and findings on alternatives to Clearlight (and Blu-U) treatments. Bear in mind that this is still preliminary, and I am not a doctor, and I might have some holes in my data, so bear with me! But my daughter has been through a lot, and I have made it my mission to find help for her. I am not affiliated with any of the links I give here, and am not intending to promote any particular company. They are just samples of my research.

BTW, in case anyone wonders... the name refers to my old (now deceased) dog named Sheila, who was black border collie mix!

As you may already know, light in the range of 407-420 nm is very effective for killing p-acnes bacteria, provided you get sufficient intensity to penetrate the follicles. The FDA approved such therapy and is currently investigating approval of Levulan with blue light for acne. Many doctors are already using this light treatment as it has produced results. Several companies offer high intensity narrow band blue light treatments, usually at 50 -100 dollars a pop. I know in general the blue light therapy works to some degree, because my daughter responded well when we paid about $100 per visit to the doctor with a Clearlight Machine four years ago.


(EDITED: References to a "Shop Light" type of clearlight replacement fixture was deleted per Techguy's reply in this thread showing it to be non-effective)

We found a lower power device sold by a fellow on Ebay which is said to be a specially manufactured T5 Quad FML type compact size fluorescent bulb to produce the 420 nm light that fits in a desk top lamp fixture (making it ideal for use while lying in bed or on the floor). I decided to buy this for my daughter.

EDIT: 11-2-07 She has been using it for almost 8 weeks now, and I believe she is getting some clearing effects from the light. She has not had any more cystic acne since using it and very few smaller breakouts. This is only anecdotal, so be sure to read later posts by other members who might be testing this same device.

Light intensity drops quickly as distance increases. Each time you double the distance from a light, you cut the intensity to 1/4. On the other hand, when you get twice as close to a light, you increase the intensity by 4X. The doctor office clearlight lamps are HOT and so you have to be further away than using cooler flourescent bulbs. This means you can get much closer to a lower wattage fluor and get comparable results.

Fluorescent bulbs usually are rated for light output (lumens) compared to a regular light bulbs. 13 watts fluor = 60 watts regular. 27 watt fluor puts out the same light as about 130-150 watts of a regular bulb (maybe 1500 lumens). I ordered a special light bulb from the ebay merchant who had the bulbs specially manufactured and they are 420 nm (according to what is printed on the bulb). I purchased the lamp and first bulb at auction and then got an extra bulb. (you can only get the bulb if you buy the entire fixture first on auction), and then I got an extra bulb and desklamp fixture from home depot. My daughter is using both (so total equivallent wattage is around 260 to 280 watts from two 27 watt fluors) with about 3000 lumens. She keeps the light about 8-12 inches from her face for 15-20 minutes and wears eye goggles.

In doing my research, I found that 420nm lights are fairly common in a place you might not consider: fish tanks. The 420 nm deep blue light is exactly what fish tank owners want for making the water look like deep ocean colors, along with a 10000K type bulb for enhancing sunlight effects. I considered making my own light for her, but the "fishtank" lights are not as convenient to use while lying down in bed. But they will work if you set them on a desk and face them (more on this below) or you could create short legs and then place yourself under the fixture which is propped up on 12-18 inch legs on four sides. Be sure to protect your eyes with any bright light!

Here are some links regarding the light we bought on ebay (i guess I am giving this guy free advertising!) As I mentioned, I then bought an extra desk lamp fixture at home depot that uses this type of bulb. They also carry the one the guy actually sells on ebay for $19 (Hampton Bay model 1127, uses FML27 bulb, and I think the HomeDepot SKU # is 207142, apparently also called "Lights of America" model 1127HB, not available on line but only at certain stores. Try doing a google search with "Light of America 1127HB" and see if it comes up.

BUT -- his special desk size FML 27W 420nm fluor bulb is apparently not available anywhere on the net. I have searched extensively. He says he had it specially manufactured for him, and that seems to be the case.

http://cgi.ebay.com/Acne-Treatment-FDA-APP...1QQcmdZViewItem

If that link is expired, search on ebay using the following word group:

Acne Treatment FDA APPROvED Blue Light Therapy No chem!

His lamp is a quad, T5 FML 27W. It has four prongs and fixtures that hold these type of bulbs are common and usually are desklamps. Actual pictures of his lamp are at the end of this post below. There were many testimonials about this guy's ebay light, and i wrote to several people who had bought it. They said it was helping them, but the jury is still out so don't go out and order one on my say so just yet!

Here are supposed light spectrums for true actinic 03 bulbs--the closer to 420 the better, but watch out for UV in the light, as that would be not so good for you. UV is roughly below 400 nm extending into the 300nm range.

http://www.bestgrowlights.com/site/403863/page/436991 (see pure actinic blue spectrum on top)

http://ledmuseum.candlepower.us/seventh/phitld15.gif (true actinic)

I know you can get much higher wattage for less money. For example, there are fixtures that can hold 2 x 96 watt bulbs i think. When they sell the fixtures, they usually ship with 1 actinic and 1 10000K bulbs (this combines the deep blue and sunlight spectrum) but you can simply buy an extra actinic and replace the 10000K bulb. See first link below

http://www.petsolutions.com/Lunar-Aqualigh...402+C99999.aspx

In the above link, the 24 inch fixture provides 2 x 65 watts *IF* you bought an extra actinic bulb to replace the 10000K bulb they ship with. We are trying my daughter with the ebay product, plus one extra bulb (2 x 27 watts currently), so this 24 inch fixture is more than double the 420 nm light output and might be a better use of your money, if you can comfortably figure out how to use the 24 inch fixture (or create a base and arm to hold it above a bed). I thought of using the kind of stands that musicians use for microphones, with a heavy base and long arm. If you do try it, please let me know or post to the message boards!

However, I do not know for sure if these lights have any significant UV components, so maybe someone else can research this issue. I am going to make a logical leap and assume the manufacturers would not want UV components in these lights because folks sit close to, and stare at their fishtanks and if people starting getting eye damage, it might be bad for business....

One additional thought. It can take up to 4 weeks to start to see results, assuming we have a light with sufficient intensity to produce results at all. Even in the Doctor office, it was about 3 weeks for results to appear, but that was only 1 time per week, and with these lights, you can do it every day. As I recall, with the Clearlight treatments, there was a period of increased breakouts as the light killed deep bacteria during the initial weeks.

Hope this helps! The Ebay lamps are shown below..... Higher detail pics are on the last post of page 2 of this thread






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Jump to... Go to top
Hello, Guest.
It looks like you didn't set up an avatar.
Do you want to set up an avatar now?
Let's do it!
refresh page when finished
     Remind me in a few days