did you take accutane in the 1980s?
#1
Posted 11 December 2006 - 03:31 AM
so if you have taken accutane anytime during the 1980s id like to hear your opinion of the drug.
Id like to form a good opinion on the drug, because there is alot of evidence for serious long term side effects, even years after.
#2
Posted 11 December 2006 - 03:44 AM
1. Accutane likely cleared them, why would they hang around an acne site, plain and simple.
2. Females gave birth to deformed babies. ( pretty sure alot of this happened, no one knew about the effects to unborn babies)
#3
Posted 11 December 2006 - 03:46 AM
#4
Posted 11 December 2006 - 03:47 AM
#5
Posted 11 December 2006 - 09:51 AM
The only side effects that persisted from my first course were dryness related. My skin, mouth, lips, and eyes were drier than they had been before the course, and it was years before i could wear contact lenses. I used small amounts of lip balm ever since.
#6
Posted 12 December 2006 - 01:17 PM
so if you have taken accutane anytime during the 1980s id like to hear your opinion of the drug.
Id like to form a good opinion on the drug, because there is alot of evidence for serious long term side effects, even years after.
I took the med in '85 or '86. It kept me totally clear for 5 + years, and reasonably clear for another couple of years - even though it was a low-ish dose (40 mg/day; about 65mg/kg cumulative - I'm a 75 KG male). When the acne returned, it was much better than originally.
I took the second course (same dosage) 10 years later ('96). In retrospect, I should have gone for it a couple years sooner.
Now I'm on my third course and plan to take the full 120+ mg/kg cumulative dose even though my acne is not bad at all (but still persistent). The only reason I'm taking the third course is that it is my strong opinion that with proper medical supervision, accutane is better for me than indefinite, long term antibiotics (which is what was needed for my persistent condition).
Absolutely no long term side effects that I can identify.
I'm not sure that there is "a lot of evidence for serious long term side effects, even years after." I read a recent study that showed absolutely no long term effect on blood lipids or liver functions even after multiple courses. HAve you read something contrary to this?
#7
Posted 12 December 2006 - 02:23 PM
#8
Posted 12 December 2006 - 02:28 PM
1. Accutane likely cleared them, why would they hang around an acne site, plain and simple.
2. Females gave birth to deformed babies. ( pretty sure alot of this happened, no one knew about the effects to unborn babies)
they always new about the birth defects since before it hit the market.
they probably would not have outgrown it.
#9
Posted 12 December 2006 - 02:58 PM
I know i'd have never outgrown it. Both my parents still have it and my mom's going through menopause for crying out loud. There is a family history that extends beyond just my parents as well (their siblings, my cousins, etc).
Accutane saved me from a lot of scarring and allowed me to feel normal throughout my long remission.
#10
Posted 12 December 2006 - 05:33 PM
probably yes, tane changes etiopathogenesis of acne which means that after the course acne is not going with its normal rhythm anymore.
#11
Posted 26 May 2007 - 02:06 AM
#12
Posted 26 May 2007 - 07:40 AM
1. Accutane likely cleared them, why would they hang around an acne site, plain and simple.
2. Females gave birth to deformed babies. ( pretty sure alot of this happened, no one knew about the effects to unborn babies)
they always new about the birth defects since before it hit the market.
they probably would not have outgrown it.
hmm..i dunno if they would have outgrown it. my mom took her first round of accutane when she was 40 after dealing with cystic acne for yeeeeeeeears.
#13
Posted 26 May 2007 - 08:38 AM
Accutane was the best move I've ever done in my life, simple as that. It's given me a whole new life back that I lost when I hit 13. May sound absurd, but I'd take 2 years of acne free lifestyle (and it was bad), than 10 years of a life with cysts all the time.
Main thing is people who read on these forums are well informed through them, they know the risks and possible side effects and the precautions they should take.
#14
Posted 26 May 2007 - 03:49 PM
No, there's not. The medical literature points to the contrary, actually. Unless, of course, you're using web board anecdotes as "evidence."
#15
Posted 26 May 2007 - 04:01 PM
No, there's not. The medical literature points to the contrary, actually. Unless, of course, you're using web board anecdotes as "evidence."
yes i do realize that testimonials only carry so much weight but they arent any less important. here is a study that would give a more accurate idea of the risks of long term side effects.
1: Br J Dermatol. 1994 Sep;131(3):360-3. Links
Long-term safety of isotretinoin as a treatment for acne vulgaris.
Goulden V,
Layton AM,
Cunliffe WJ.
Department of Dermatology, General Infirmary at Leeds, U.K.
We assessed possible long-term side-effects of isotretinoin therapy in 720 patients who had received one or more courses of treatment, and had a mean follow-up period of 4.9 years (range 2-12 years). Most patients (442) had received a total cumulative dose of 120-200 mg/kg body weight. One hundred and sixty-two patients received a cumulative dose of < 120 mg/kg body weight, and 116 received a cumulative dose > 200 mg/kg. Fifty-two patients (7.2%) reported persistent symptoms during the follow-up period. No correlation was found between age, sex, cumulative dose, or number of courses of isotretinoin and occurrence of reported possible side-effects. The reported symptoms were predominantly musculoskeletal (2%) or mucocutaneous (4.8%), and were mild in all cases. Xeroderma, dry eye syndrome, arthralgia, and possible exacerbation of eczema, were considered to be infrequent but probable long-term side-effects. The findings of this study indicate that isotretinoin in the treatment of acne is a safe drug, with no serious long-term side-effects.
but the whole idea of this thread was to get some testimonials as well as they are still a decent source of information.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



Home












