Given what I've heard about Accutane and Spiro, I'm honestly surprised that Spiro does not get prescribed more. I understand Spiro may not work for everyone (men... others with certain health conditions), but it seems to have quite a high success rate and that eligible candidates should try this before Accutane?
What do you all think? It's something I plan to speak with my derm about at the end of this month before getting my second month prescription for Accutane.
Thanks for any input.
I never tried Accutane, so I can't speak to that. However, Spiro (at the right dosage) has been a savior for me. Go and check out the book "The Hormonally Vulerable Woman", chapter 18, pages 276-287. You will be enlightened. He really compares the two treatments. This book gave me hope and the hope turned into success for me. I have no side effects from spiro and it does give my skin a very nice glow too. I would think it is much less costly (than Accutane) treatment and it is still very effective.
On a side note, I had to go to three different derms to finally find one that wanted to use hormonally-based treatment. The first two just wanted to prescribe all kinds of topicals (which do not work to control hormones, they only treat the symptom, not the cause) and when those didn't work, it was "Well, there's always Accutane". Finally, I found a derm who looked at things in a different way. She (sorry, guys, but usually the women dr's are more intune to the hormonal link) said that nearly all acne is hormonal and suggested Spiro for me. I had never heard of it, but this book backed it up as well. It is a God-send for me.



Home












