QUOTE
Bodybuilding has very little to do with weight lifting.
QUOTE
QUOTE
Bodybuiling has more to do with huge amount of calories, micromanaging of one's diet and drugs. Normal weight lifting alone who can do everyone will never build alone the amount of muscle mass you see in a competitive body builder
QUOTE
Of course nutrition and drugs affect a persons muscle mass but what the hell are you talking about?????? argue the point, you said anaerobic exercise is the same hormonally as aerobic exercise, it most certainly isn't.
QUOTE
If you just swim normally and you just lift weights normally just for general health and conditioning you're not to put on more mass with the weight lifting.
QUOTE
Yes you will.
I phrased my sentence wrongly. If you just lift weights normally, eating normally with a normal intensity you're not going to put on much more more mass than if you'd chosen swimming as your muscle building exercises; in the same amount of time
Of course since you can always increase the weights eventually you won't put on more muscle mass with weight lifting but you're going to put on muscle mass for longer as when the body adapts to the resistence you can increase the weights which you can't do when the resistance is provided by your body weight or the water.
So long term one will be able to put on more muscle mass while weight lifting simply by keeping putting on muscle mass at an high rate for longer time
QUOTE
The intensity if very important because if you choose an high number of repetition for a not to heavy amount of weight you're not going to produce as much growth hormone as if you were lifting heavy for a short number of set keeping your workout less than 40 minutes
QUOTE
Yes the intensity of a workout affects GH/Androgens the higher the intensity the higher the presence of these hormones, aerobic exercise is MUCH LOWER INTENSITY THAN ANAEROBIC EXERCISE.
High intensity swimming is not that much lower than low intensity weight lifting
QUOTE
Long distance runnning besides doesn't build much muscle, actually it catabolizes the muscle you've put on with another sport (it's a reason why they look so skinny)
EXACTLY. The hormonal effects of distance running are much different to the hormonal effects of BB, you are now agreeing with me and arguing against yourself.
Distance running is an aerobic activity where muscles often shrink in size to accomodate to an aerobic metabolism and more often than not they're catabolized as well. Swimming is an aerobic activity which build muscle and damage them pretty severely and where lot of growth hormone is released afterwards
on the other hand swimming does build muscles even more than moderate weight lifting.
No it doesn't swimming is LESS intense than BB.
Weight lifting by itself buil muscles in an harmonious way making your body lean but not bulky, the bulkyniss of bodybuilder has nothing to do with weight lifting
Weight lifting does not make you lean, if done inconjunction with a high carb diet it will make you bulky for sure. What the hell this has to do with anything I don't know.
By lean I mean not bulky, not as in "lower fat" but as in unable to put on enough muscle mass to be bulky (I know that lean means a different thing but I'm using the word in a different sense because I don't know what other word to use)
I've been involved in weight lifting for years and I've seen natural bodybuilding contests, and I've never seen someone able to be "bulky" with just lifting weights
Coleman may have a 5% body fat but I don't consider him "lean" as a figure because unlike a lean man he looks like a wardrobe in which quarters of beef have been glued. English is not my native language so I don't have a better term to explain what I mean. The point is that weight lifting alone is not able to produce that kind of mass increase and that the physique of people like Coleman and company has very little to do with their weight lifting, and more to do with dianabol or insulin injected in the veins.
The amount of growth hormone released depends on muscle damage and repairing. That's why for example sprinting releases more growth hormone than weight lifting because the damage is bigger. Swimming too causes muscles damage and repair. Long distance runnning doesn't and it's not uncommon for long distance runners to lose much of their muscle mass.
SWIMMING DAMAGES YOU MUSCLES MUCH LESS THAN BB.
And besides the higher intensity anarobic exercises hormonal response where more testosterone is released has nothing to do with damaging and repairing muscles
So far there are no evidences that testosterone is anabolic or that muscle growth is dependent on it, clinical trials using massive dose of testosterone have been unable to show that it helps increasing muscle growth nor that it stimulates the synthesis of protein
Insulin sensitivity is increased in both kind of physical activity and as a matter of face the postworkout meal suggest to weight lifters is the same suggested to swimmming teams: simple high GI carbs and protein without fats and so the effect on IGF-1 on both kinds of exercise are basically the same
The affect on IGF-1 is very much different, Bodybuilders do higher intensity workouts, thus increasing their GH much higher than swimmers, GH is converted into IGF-1, infact it's the main mediator of IGF-1. Another mediator of IGF-1 is insulin, low-intesity/long duration exercise such as swimming distance running burns a large amount of calories, DECREASES insulin, and INCREASES insulin sensitivity, High-intesity/short-duration exercise such as BB does not burn a large amount of callories the large carbohydrate/protein meals eaten by BB will vastly INCREASE insulin and REDUCE insulin sensitivity.
Have you read the studies that analisys the hormonal responses to different kind of intensity exercises. Weight lifting change its intensity a lot according to the amount of set, reps, resting intervals and duration of the workout. And it's not a little change, the different is so bug that you may consider a way to lift weight compared to the other a different exercise in itself. The hormonal responses from weight lifting to swimming differs greatly when there a maximum load, few reps, short sets and the duration of the workout is short, but if the weight is lower, the reps are more and the duration of the workout exceed 35 minuts the hormonal response changes so mach to almost equate the hormonal responses to high intensity muscle building swimming. And I've argued so fat that on average the people in this forum are not interested in the kind of high intensity weight lifting workout which is potentially dangeour.
As another boy here who lift weight said, people here choose low weights, higher reps, more sets, longer intervals and longer workout. If you see the hormonal response of such kind of physical activity you will see it doesn't differ much from high intensity swimming where muscles are badly damaged and grow.
Again I'm with the others who said that weight lifting doesn't affect their acne more than jogging, jumping rope, playing basketball ... in face weight lifting (warm up + inverse pyramid and not max load for few repetition) is the kind of esercisex that the least affect my hormonal acne. I can produce way much more growth hormone jumping, sprinting or swimming
I'm not debating whether or not it affects your acne. You said they were the same hormonally, the hormonal effects are very much different.
No, they're not that much different and the difference depends on the intensity. Low intensity weight lifting does not differ much from high intensity swimming. Check the studies that analysis the hormonal responses of reistance training compared to the chosen intensity of the exercise