Thank_you_001I take it for granted sometimes, but I think it’s so cool that we have such an active, helpful, supportive community of people on Acne.org sharing their knowledge and experience.

So in the spirit of Thanksgiving, I just wanted to say thanks to all of you who are active here at Acne.org, whether that be through adding your honest review of products or treatments you have tried, or whether it is asking and/or answering questions on the forum, uploading pictures to the gallery, or keeping a blog of your experience with acne treatment.

How much do we all rock?! A lot.

ZapA 2012 article published in the International Journal of Dermatology attempted to evaluate whether using a tiny 1.5mm long electrical needle to zap sebaceous glands (pores) might be able to permanently disable these glands and thus prevent acne. Only 12 patients were studied, so replication is of course needed, but the initial results are quite interesting. The researchers treated each patient 3 times at 1-month intervals for 30-60 minutes per treatment. During treatment, the researchers inserted the needle into each active lesion for about half a second and sent 40 watts of electricity into the gland.

The results: “All of the subjects…showed a reduction in inflammatory and non-inflammatory acne lesions after three selective electrothermolysis treatments.” A month after the final treatment mean inflammatory acne was reduced 98.14% and non-inflammatory acne was reduced 83.09%. What is perhaps most interesting is that 1 year after the final treatment, only 2 out of 12 patients relapsed.

Side effects: “All patients reported transient post-treatment erythema (redness), which faded after a few days.”

Quite interesting indeed. I noticed no other studies have been performed on this method, but I would like to see this studied more widely.

References:

  • Lee JW, et al. “Selective sebaceous gland electrothermolysis as a treatment for acne: a prospective pilot study.” International Journal of Dermatology. 2012; 51(3): 339-44.

Head in HandsI’ve read or overheard countless times the faulty warning, “Be careful not to touch your skin because you can move bacteria around and cause acne to spread.” On the myths page here at Acne.org I dispel this myth. What is really happening is when you touch your skin–especially when you touch it roughly and frequently–you are physically irritating the skin. This physical irritation is what can lead to acne symptoms.

Let’s get into a little bit of the science behind this. Now that the genome of acne bacteria (P. acnes) has been decoded, we know that there are three types: I, II and III, and two subtypes, IA and IB. Recently, a group of researchers took a close look at acne bacteria in both people with acne and “healthy” controls. They published the results in the British Journal of Dermatology. One of their major findings is that the presence of P. acnes bacteria on the surface of the skin was almost identical between people with acne and controls: 40.4% vs. 40.0%. They also looked inside inflammatory acne lesions (papules and pustules) and what they found there was that a certain subtype IA was markedly increased, while other types and subtypes were decreased.

The researchers conclude: “…we suggest that distribution patterns of P. acnes over the skin surface at the phylotype level do not support its involvement in the initiation of comedogenesis or inflammation…However, type IA P. acnes…might be more closely associated with inflammatory acne lesions.”

This is pretty cool stuff. The more we understand exactly which types of bacteria are involved in which types of lesions, the better we might be able to specifically target them in the future. In the meantime, there is no reason to feel that if you touch your skin you are “moving bacteria around” and causing acne.

References:

  • Kwon HH, et al. “Analysis of distribution patterns of Propionibacterium acnes phylotypes and Peptostrepococcus species from acne lesions.” British Journal of Dermatology. 2013; 169(5): 1152-5.

korean questionnaire 2Korean researchers gave 136 acne patients in Korea a questionnaire to gauge the patients’ understanding of proper skin care and determine their skin care habits. They then published the results in the International Journal of Dermatology. The results are almost exactly what I would expect from patients inside the United States or anywhere else in the world for that matter. The researchers state, “We doctors have put so much effort into fine-tuning laser parameters and dosages of medication in the past that we might have underrated the role of the patient.”

The questionnaire answers highlight several problems, including excessive face washing. A full 42.7% of respondents wash their face excessively, with 28.7% washing “vigorously until it feels silky,” and 14% washing “until I cannot detect sebum at all.” Physical irritation of the skin is one of the major factors that keep people entrenched in a cycle of acne. One of the easiest and best ways for these respondents to immediately improve their acne would be to wash lightly with a gentle cleanser for only a short period of time.

Next, the researchers asked respondents to answer what they thought caused acne. The most common answer was stress at 27.2%. Excessive sebum production came in tied for second with diet at 14.7% and insufficient cleansing was next at 14%. A few things stand out here. First, while stress is an aggravating factor, it is nowhere near as causal as excessive sebum. Next, insufficient cleansing is rarely a cause of acne. The contrary is true. Overly cleansing causes far more acne symptoms than insufficient cleansing. The scientific community is still gathering evidence on diet to determine if diet is as much of a causal factor as the respondents thought.

After looking at the answers to this questionnaire the researchers state, “This study showed that our patients may be making a great deal of errors and that we may be neglecting them. To effectively treat and prevent further breakouts, appropriate skin care is imperative in patients with acne.” In other words, it is extremely difficult for acne patients to see the results they desire when they are actively practicing bad habits such as over-cleansing the skin.

The moral of this story is similar to many others when it comes to acne. First, be gentle. Do not scrub your skin. Wash only twice a day and wash exceedingly gently for only a short period of time. I recommend 10 seconds or less. Then, don’t expect miracles from the vast majority of acne treatments that your doctor might prescribe. Only a few treatments provide complete clearing of the skin.

Props to these researchers for gathering this information and for responding to it so honestly and clearly. Dermatologists need to better educate patients to stay gentle with their skin if acne clearing is desired.

References:

  • Navarete-Solis J, et al. “A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial of Niacinamide 4% versus Hydroquinone 4% in the Treatment of Melasma.” Dermatology Research and Practice. 2011.

Acne mechanicaWhen you have acne, it’s tempting to try to scrub it away. But decades of acne research shows us that physical irritation will actually cause acne. This is such a generally accepted condition amongst dermatologists and medical researchers that it has its own name: acne mechanica.

A recent article in the journal Dermatology once again reports on this problem. Three female patients presented with what can only be described as horrible acne. It came on fast and was in the area where they were scrubbing their face with various skin care products. The authors of the article considered the products to be non-comedogenic and ruled out the products themselves as the cause of the acne. In fact, in a nod to cosmetic companies, the authors state, “…nowadays, cosmetic companies are carefully testing their compounds for comedogenicity before marketing, and cosmetics are an infrequent cause of acne.” They go on to conclude, “…repetitive physical trauma could act as a trigger for severe inflammatory acne.”

The cases in this article are severe, but millions of people suffer with acne caused by everyday physical irritation. You can’t eliminate physical irritation altogether, and you shouldn’t aim to do this since it will likely drive you pretty crazy. Instead, take a few minutes to become aware of sources of physical irritation and try to reduce or eliminate them when you can. Then get on The Acne.org Regimen and add in some glycolic acid when needed and you will be nice and clear.

Helpful Links:
Sources of physical irritation
The Acne.org Regimen Instructions
How to use glycolic acid to combat irritation

References:

  • Seneschal J, et al. “Exogenous inflammatory acne due to combined application of cosmetic and facial rubbing.” Dermatology. 2012; 224(3): 221-3.

Screen Shot 2014-10-21 at 4.19.12 PMI have written about niacinamide (AKA nicotinamide), the active component in vitamin B3, for a couple of years now. Evidence shows it can help significantly reduce acne through its anti-inflammatory effects. However, the more I look into this ingredient, the cooler it becomes. The latest double-blind study I found in the journal Dermatology Research and Practice has researchers administering 4% niacinamide to patients with melasma or dark patches of skin from sun exposure. Melasma is much more common in women and is an extremely prevalent condition experienced during pregnancy. The reason I find this particularly interesting is because people with acne often experience dark/red spots after acne lesions heal, also called hyperpigmentation.

The study pitted 4% Niacinamide against 4% hydroquinone for the treatment of melasma. Results were similar. “Good to excellent improvement was observed with niacinamide in 44% of patients, compared to 55% with HQ.” The lightening effect of niacinamide took a little longer to exhibit itself and was evident at 8 weeks versus 4 weeks for hydroquinone.

As far as side effects go, “Treatment with niacinamide showed no significant side effects and was well tolerated.” This is in contrast to “moderate adverse effects” in 18% of the hydroquinone patients.

I am in the process now of trying niacinamide in Acne.org products because of the breadth and depth of compelling research that exists now on this simple yet effective ingredient. I’ll let you know how that goes.

References:

  • Navarete-Solis J, et al. “A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial of Niacinamide 4% versus Hydroquinone 4% in the Treatment of Melasma.” Dermatology Research and Practice. 2011.

revolving doorI remember back in middle school when I started getting acne and asking my mom to take me to the dermatologist. I always felt better after seeing the dermatologist. He or she always wrote me a prescription for a medication which was supposed to clear me up. I tried oral antibiotics, topical antibiotics, retinoids, sulfur, and a few other prescriptions. Inevitably, they didn’t work, and I’d come back for another prescription, this time hoping that this one would actually clear me up. What all of these dermatologists failed to tell me is that most prescriptions only work to clear up acne to a degree.

As the researcher for Acne.org, I read hundreds of clinical trials and studies on acne each year. The latest article I just read was to test the “…efficacy and tolerability of tazarotene foam, 0.1%, in the treatment of acne…” Like most other articles on prescriptions for acne, the conclusion to this study sounds familiar: “Tazarotene foam, 0.1% significantly reduced the number and severity of acne lesions after 12 weeks and had a safe and acceptable tolerability profile.” That sounds great, doesn’t it? But when you read the article, you find that the decrease in acne lesions hovers around 50%. Sure, results are scientifically significant, but is someone with 20 zits on their face going to be happy with 10? That is still full fledged acne if you ask me. In my opinion, dermatologists should communicate clearly that most prescriptions will help improve the skin, but will not clear you up.

1 exception: Accutane (isotreinoin) completely clears acne in most people who take an adequate dosage for a long enough period of time, but comes with side effects, some of which can be long-term and some of which can be severe.

1 other exception: When used within The Acne.org Regimen, 2.5% benzoyl peroxide will also completely clear the skin, and does so without any severe or long-term side effects. It’s refreshing to be able to tell people what dermatologists were never able to confidently tell me. The Acne.org Regimen will clear you up. Completely.

References:

  • Feldman SR, Werner CP, Alio Saenz AB. “The efficacy and tolerability of tazarotene foam, 0.1%, in the treatment of acne vulgaris in 2 multi center, randomized, vehicle-controlled, double-blind studies.” Journal of Drugs in Dermatology. 2013; 12(4): 438-46.

LowDoseA typical full dose of Accutane (isotretinoin) is 40-50mg per day and the typical length of treatment is 15-20 weeks in order to achieve the recommended cumulative dose of 120mg/kg of bodyweight over the course of a cycle. However, as the years go on, researchers have been conducting more studies on low-dose Accutane (isotreinoin) to see if they can get the same results with less side effects. Generally speaking, the research is showing that even at a low dose of 20mg per day, people see good results, albeit not as impressive as when the full dose is used, and also with a higher incidence of relapse.

However, one recent study published in Advanced Biomedical Research is particularly interesting. In this study, they gave patients a low dose of 20mg per day but kept the patients on this low dose for quite a long time (10-22 months) in order to achieve the usual recommended cumulative dose of 120mg/kg of bodyweight. 96.4% of patients “demonstrated complete clearing of their acne, defined as no acne or occasional isolated lesions.” Relapse was low as well. “In a 5-year follow-up, relapse accrued in…7.9% of patients.” Side effects were, “…mild, and only 6 patients (out of 146) discontinued study medication because of severe adverse events.”

This is the first study where patients receive a low dose of isotretinoin, but are kept on this dose until the cumulative dose reaches the full 120mg/kg. Results from this study look impressive, and relapse rates are low. The authors admit, however, “The only pitfall is it is longer than 10 months duration of treatment period.”

Perhaps it is time to take a second look at how Accutane (isotretinoin) is administered.

References:

  • Rasi A, et al. “Efficacy of fixed daily 20mg of isotretinoin in moderate to severe scar prone acne.” Advanced Biomedical Research. 2014; 3: 103.